61

Very sleek stuff, but reading the analysis gives bad vibes - what is their deal? Trot stuff? Can someone give me a good workup (I'm lazy)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

Let alone Jacobin for a second:

You think getting one article placed in a magazine makes you wealthy intelligentsia? Lol how much do you think writers make?

Unless they are already independently famous as an author, or it's a mega publication, the author of most magazine articles you've read probably made somewhere between 2 and low-4 figures for weeks worth of work

[-] Chronicon@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yeah this is true. Jacobin might trend a bit wealthier than a similarly (small) sized general interest mag, and intelligentsia I would say applies to the majority of their writers regardless (as professors and think tank people,) even if though they probably aren't wealthy. Article writing itself is generally not lucrative, and honestly neither is most levels of academia.

It'd be convenient if they were just rich but I think they're mostly genuine libs. It is probably still true that they would risk their jobs by advocating revolutionary actions

[-] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

I think there's also simply the problem that magazine editors today will not print "I would like to behead my landlord", and that magazine may not even be its own landlord to be able to print that. What makes it into published periodicals is not necessarily the most left thought the author or the editor has ever had.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
61 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13445 readers
828 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS