177
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by HipPriest@kbin.social to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

‘Eurowings should be ashamed of how they handled this situation,’ says passenger

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Moghul@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 year ago

One thing in advance: Leah Williams was not forced to buy all packages of peanuts on board – on the contrary, our purser tried to offer her an alternative solution by informing all passengers sitting around her about Leah’s allergy. She agreed at first but then decided to still buy all the packages.

The airline says it is “unable to guarantee that the aircraft is free of foodstuffs that may trigger an allergic reaction, such as peanuts”, because passengers are allowed to bring their own food onboard.

I feel bad for her but I have to wonder, how does this person function on a day to day basis? If their allergy is so severe that other people eating peanuts around her would harm her, how does she leave the house? How did she navigate the airport?

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Yeah exactly, if her allergy was that severe - which it evidently was not, see the comment by Eurowings about a general buildup due to the nature of airplane flight and airplane in-air circulation and she survivedt hat - then she would naturally not be flying commercial. There'd be no way to do that without immediately triggering her allergy.

[-] DrZoidberg@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but did she handle the packages of nuts after purchase? Because if she did, she came into contact with an absolute shit ton of nut particles, and would have had a reaction.

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Don't take health advice from Zoidberg

[-] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Also wouldn’t there still be shit in the air and on surfaces from the previous flight where everyone enjoyed their peanuts?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Peanuts are not ubiquitous in public. Being near several people eating them in a fairly enclosed space is very different than walking through and airport and someone 25 feet away has a bag of peanuts.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

The air within an airplane cabin is recirculated every five or ten minutes. A real severe peanut allergy would be triggered by anyone on the plane eating peanuts.

[-] stink_pickle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

are planes cleansed that thoroughly between flights? I assume one would have to worry about who was eating what in the area from a previous flight with an allergy that severe

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] FunkyMonkey@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The majority of airplanes are equipped with HEPA filters. As in, removing 99,97% of particles over 0.3 micron in size. The unfiltered air is fed in from the outside. It's pretty clean and not a consideration for allergens like peanut particles.

Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/how-clean-is-the-air-on-your-airplane-coronavirus-cvd

Living with allergies such as a severe peanut allergy is all about mitigating risk

In most open areas you can be cautious about what you touch and who you stand near to. In enclosed spaces such as airplanes, the risk is substantial and mitigating it requires as close to an absence of peanuts as possible

And peanuts are special in how easily they trigger severe reactions. Of all my son's allergies, peanuts are the one that scare us

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I would hope the air is filtered before recirculating.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

It's sort of is. But mostly they just mix it with a bit of outside air bumped up to pressure and release the difference, but it's not really filtered, except in the sense that over time it will be filtered because the contaminated air will eventually all leave.

I'm sure they have filters like cars have filters but they're not going to remove micro particles.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That seems extremely stupid when airplanes are already major disease vectors, especially after covid.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Aircraft ironically actually had cleaner air back when they allowed smoking, because they then actually did have to filter the air.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

That just sounds like utter bullshit mate

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Air in a pressurised plane isn't recirculated, it's replaced with new air from outside.

[-] childOfMagenta@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

It is recirculated and fresh air is mixed with it.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I assume they filter it in some way, but okay.

[-] Moghul@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah I had that thought too but if this were the case, would you take a life threatening risk that no one else on the plane has peanuts? Wouldn't you drive instead? Or take a means of public transportation where they don't regularly sell your allergen?

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

That's not necessarily feasible. Maybe she has a schedule? Doesn't have a car? Doesn't have a license?

Also, some reactions are uncomfortable but not deadly. I have an anaphylactic allergy to tree nuts, as in, all true nuts (as peanuts are a legume, i'm fine with them). However, I've never had an anaphylactic reaction, though I was prescribed an EpiPen and told it could become worse with no warning. I get oral itchiness, stinging lips and mouth, heartburn, acid reflux, and diarrhea from actually eating nuts. I'm not sure what it is like for people who are sensitive to the airborne level. It might just resemb le environmental allergies like sneezing, red eyes and so forth. And if you do have to use an EpiPen, it's painful to inject and then you have to go to the hospital afterwards. Not certain death, again, but uncomfortable and inconvenient.

[-] unwellsnail@artemis.camp 17 points 1 year ago

I imagine she navigated those things with great difficulty and made the best decisions she could. She, like any other person with a medical condition or disability, exists in a world that usually will be hostile to her survival. Yet she must still exist within it. Sometimes people have to do things like take flights and rarely can someone afford to take measures that would best protect them (like a private flight or something in this case). Sounds like she didn't want to announce her private medical information to everyone around her so she did what she could to keep safe, buy all the peanuts. Ideally she wouldn't have to, peanut allergies are pretty well known and if we cared about increasing access for people not having peanuts for sale on planes is a pretty simple step. Until then people will keep being put into scenarios like this then scrutinized for the choices they make.

I was watching a video of people who are "allergic" to electromagnetic waves. It's easy to forget empathy.

It's easy to laugh at them. But they are suffering from something rough.

If they're living their life and solving their own problems, god speed.

Allergy lady didn't go Karen. She bought all the nuts. Seems open and closed in my book. Yet people are mocking her for her disability? Okay.

[-] Moghul@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

She did actually agree to have that information shared with the other passengers and then still bought all the peanuts. I'm not saying she's faking her allergy or something, I'm trying to wrap my head around her train of thought here. You can also take a car, a train, a bus, all means of transportation where the transport company doesn't sell you peanuts. Yeah it's less convenient but shit man, it won't kill you.

Ideally she wouldn’t have to, peanut allergies are pretty well known and if we cared about increasing access for people not having peanuts for sale on planes is a pretty simple step

100% agree with this though

[-] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

She claims she offered to tell the people around her not to buy them but the airline refused. The airline says they had agreed to do that but she decided to buy them all anyway. So it wasn’t about giving up private medical information (which wouldn’t make much sense anyway since she announced it to the world through this article). There’s also the fact that you’re very rarely “forced” to fly anywhere, especially in Europe. I just checked Google Maps and a flight from London to Düsseldorf is a little over an hour. There are train options for about 5 and half hours. That’s obviously a pretty big difference, but definitely workable if the allergy is really that severe. There’s also the fact she could’ve called ahead of time and asked about options instead of trying to strongarm the flight attendants into doing what she wanted.

And yeah, it wouldn’t be that difficult to not sell peanuts but that’s not the only thing people are allergic too. Unless they were going to not sell any snacks and not allow any outside food, it’d be impossible to prevent all allergens. That’s one of those things that the only possible solution is the person with the disorder to do their best to mitigate exposure, which means making sacrifices like taken a few trains for 6 hours instead of a convenient flight. There’s lots of people that due to various restrictions can’t always take the most convenient option.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I've known people with severe food allergies, so I empathize with the caution needed in their everyday lives, but I'm pretty sure this woman went overboard. Which is a bit odd, considering she was 27 years old, which makes me suspect she's dealt with this allergy for many years and should be used to having to deal with non-allergic people around her.

There are a lot of tragic stories of people reacting to peanuts or other allergens and dying, in situations they thought were safe

Anaphylaxis hits hard and fast - even with an immediate response, it's often not enough to save the person afflicted

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Very cautiously.

[-] KnumbKnuts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I routinely bring peanuts on flights. Not for this reason, just because I don't trust/rely on airlines to feed me.

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

A quick bit of googling indicates this was probably an Airbus 320 which another Google shows is about 123 feet long. Being generous and allowing 20 foot for cabin, loos, etc, does this mean her whole life she's never been within 100 foot of any nut?

[-] Moghul@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I guess I sort of understand, this is an enclosed space with recycled AC, but it just seems unlikely that if it was this severe she'd take a life threatening risk like this. Right?

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
177 points (94.5% liked)

Not The Onion

11837 readers
1231 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS