Progressives are the easiest vote to disenfranchise. All it takes is one wedge issue, and they are out.

And then you have the corollary on the other side - for some on the far right, all it takes is one wedge issue to drive them in. Gun control, abortion, etc. I think that's why we have to have an uphill battle every four years.

Defense, Space and Cybersecurity account for 39% of Boeing's revenue.

Because the idea was always that we need a living wage.

It seems to me to be equally plain that no business which depends for existence on paying less than living wages to its workers has any right to continue in this country. By "business" I mean the whole of commerce as well as the whole of industry; by workers I mean all workers, the white collar class as well as the men in overalls; and by living wages I mean more than a bare subsistence level-I mean the wages of decent living. -FDR

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/9075220-it-seems-to-me-to-be-equally-plain-that-no

You know it's funny, I was about to correct you and say Bugs made the joke, not Daffy, but I looked it up.

It’s widely reported that during a cartoon short titled “A Wild Hare,” a wise-cracking rabbit named Bugs Bunny called his nemesis Elmer Fudd a “poor little nimrod,” a sarcastic reference to Fudd’s skills as a hunter. Whether Bugs actually said it or it was Daffy Duck who called Fudd a “nimrod” is debatable. Bugs would get credit (it was after all a Bugs Bunny cartoon).

More reading on that for anyone interested.

soft serve ice cream was partly invented by Maggie Thatcher, much-maligned ice queen of Britiain

This sounded so wild I looked it up.

Unfortunately, "most sources agree that the soft-serve industry arose in the United States, not Britain, and that it preceded Thatcher’s arrival at J. Lyons by about a decade. In 2008, Marian Burros offered a version of the conventional narrative in the Times."

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-margaret-thatcher-soft-serve-myth

If you have to have these laws they should specifically target elective abortions. Not the medical procedure in general.

I understand you are just playing devil's advocate here, but even this is a bad idea. As we've seen in Texas, the law isn't designed for nuance, it is designed to attack women. The Texas law was supposed to have exceptions for health and safety of the woman/fetus, and we saw how that played out. Having a law that specifically targeted elective abortions would have the same problem where the state would undoubtedly put the burden of proof on the woman. "Oh, your baby has no heartbeat? Fill out this form in triplicate, get your doctor to sign it, have it notarized, and your abortion will be approved in 38 - 40 weeks."

Ok? The DC can be 15 in both scenarios.

Pendantic, but it was "is is," not "it is."

Contending his statement that "there's nothing going on between us" had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is.

You can't just magically waive a wand and "stop the Republicans." And Democrats are working to solve this problem but this doesn't happen overnight. How exactly are the Dems "playing politics?"

But none of that really matters to the point of your bad faith argument, because this problem would immediately go away if Tuberville stopped being an asshat. Pointing at the Democrats for not fixing Republican caused problems is asinine political style victim blaming.

https://joshuatreecounseling.us/2021/07/19/what-happens-if-i-tell-my-therapist-i-did-something-illegal/#:~:text=In%20Florida%2C%20duty%2Dto%2D,harm%20from%20a%20client%2Fpatient.

My layman's understanding is that if you say you committed murder 20 years ago, but your therapist doesn't believe you are actually a clear, present, and immediate danger to yourself or others, they don't actually have to report it. I find it hard to believe that there would be a situation where someone could admit to something like that and the therapist doesn't think they are at a reasonable likelihood to reoffend, but I guess the potential for the situation exists.

The link above is specific to Florida, but I'm sure that there are differences in law in different jurisdictions and probably even specifics at the federal level.

I am neither a lawyer nor a therapist, just a shitposter, so take all of this with a grain of salt.

https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/unidan

https://media.tenor.com/Wk7-YB9GIqwAAAAC/insanely-idiotic-things-ive-ever-heard.gif