witchybitchy

joined 1 month ago
[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the illustration has a closed fist so I think a hearty thwak! is called for.

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

88 to 144 thousand. hmm I've seen those numbers paired together before ...

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can see it. the underlying principle is control of oneself so anything that implies otherwise was faux pas/taboo

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

there's a conversation to have regarding reclaiming oppressive words and ideas, but it has to be driven by those being oppressed in order to really work and be felt by society as a whole as acceptable

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

people are corrupt. the Romans were no different in being hypocrites

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

iirc large dicks were seen as brutish and savage by everyone, as if you had no control over your primal, animalistic urges and just wanted to fuck all the time. small pp = civilized.

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

fuck I ate this one hard, had me seething by the end lol, thinking how could someone be so shameless

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

difference between reality and fiction is that fiction has to be believable

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

they'd just go "you know what I/the sign meant" and not concede anything

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

ah I see it now

[–] witchybitchy@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

the wig coulda just fallen apart, no? just because it poofs away doesn't mean it was his real hair. besides, hair doesn't just do that, but a wig might imo

view more: next ›