I live in Boston. I fully agree with you though in this situation the guy wasn't in the bike lane, he was on the sidewalk.
The biker was on the sidewalk, not on the road, when he got hit, and went flying over the hood of the car.
I don't know how anyone would be expected to play defense against that situation.
I have seen their name a lot, and though I think I share similar opinions with them on a lot of things, I find they tend to be more condescending and insulting for my particular preference.
Maybe killing people is the wrong solution.
I was never big on photographing my food but I found this one particularly pretty. It was over a decade ago, and I don't remember what restaurant it was. Somewhere in NYC.
Wait a sec. You're telling me that giving money to people that don't have money helps them do things that require money?! I'm shocked.
Learn to fix things yourself. Mend your clothes, fix your bike or car, patch drywall, whatever. Learning to do things gives you the option of to save money doing it yourself. If you don't learn, your only option is to pay someone else to do it.
I've given up on food delivery. With the all the fees and tips and shit to wait who the hell knows how long for food to show up colder than a penguin fart.
It's just not worth it to me anymore. Why would I want to pay for that experience? I can make less disappointing food quicker for less money.
I want to replace one half of this with longer wire, but I am not confident about the name of the connector used.
Image of JST-XH included to convey size. Ruler is metric.
When I worked at a car dealership there was a service customer named Stuart Pidasso.
Over the intercom, when they announced "Stu Pidasso, your car is ready" it sounded like "Stupid asshole, your car is ready".
I thought it was pretty funny.
Not sure if you are suggesting op gets a dog free of cost or that they should set the dog free, but I think both options are acceptable.
Harris Wolobah's cause of death is not yet determined; it's not certain if the chip is to blame.
Maybe, just maybe we should put our pitchforks away until we know if the chip mentioned is responsible?
I don't mind grabbing my pitchfork and joining the "YouTube is already ruined party", but two thoughts first:
That headline is so deliberately vague. It could literally be one employee who said "eh, I don't think YouTube shorts is a good idea".
The article itself doesn't really give you any information that isn't in the headline. It feels like an attempt to stoke anti-YouTube sentiment without providing any useful information.
...okay, with that out of the way...
Yeah, the current YouTube situation is pretty crap.
How much do you really think they care about what the constitution says?