The NYT really does take Musk at his word even when he's got a real history of banning accounts for saying true-but-left-wing things.
For sure. But as an individual, it makes a lot of sense to hide instead of fight.
He didn't run in the Democratic primary because while Democrats can be weird, Democratic voters, including the rest of the Kennedy family, tend to reject this kind of weird.
He's trying to deal with his own previous statement, which implied that Blacks can only aspire to holding some kinds of jobs.
It should, but high-quality fakes trick a large chunk of the population. As such, they ought to be treated in the same way as other non-consensual content
The article explicitly talks about lifting that cap:
Raising the cap that way — taxing affluent people more and everyone else less — would reduce the 3.5-point tax increase needed to fully fund Social Security to as little as 2.45 points, the Social Security system estimated.
Right now, it's looking like the Supreme Court is going to say "that's not allowed" but do it in a way that prevents Trump from being tried before the election. This lets them say "we're good and ethical" while protecting Trump from the consequences of his criminality:
The Supreme Court appeared poised to reject Donald Trump’s sweeping claim that he is immune from prosecution on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election, but in a way that is likely to significantly delay his stalled election-interference trial in D.C.
People are trying. Not clear that it will actually work.
Also not clear if military recruiters can enlist ones that have been frozen for 18 years.
Yep.
If he had something like a normal healthy interest in sex, even with a bit of a kink, nobody would care.
Announcing that you're a Nazi and pro-slavery is the problem here.