Checking my communities.
If just a few people who have never come to terms or heard the ideas before have engaged with it where they otherwise wouldn't have, especially if they come to the comments ready to give a reactionary piece of their mind and see the discssion, then I think the shock value strategy worked. It's ultimately the creator's choice how they present it, and I see the value in being evocative. If the title were "How Heirarchical Social Systems Contribute to Anthropogenic Climate Change," frankly it just wouldn't get the exposure. As marketing, politcal discourse, and everyday experience will attest to, appeal to emotion works.
I agree that the creator may have chosen a title that could potentially be counterproductive, but it was certainly an intentional move. At least it led to some discussion on an issue that frankly doesn't have much awareness is the generl public. "Shock value" is a strategy where creators intentionally use provocative or controversial imagery, titles, or content to elicit strong emotional reactions from their audience. This can be done to grab attention, spark discussions, and raise awareness about a particular issue, idea, or message. The goal is to make the audience think and engage with the content more deeply due to the intense emotional response it evokes. In this case, it worked pretty well, considering many videos posted have almost no discussion at all in the comments.
Edit: spelling
As Lewis’s Law dictates - the comments on any article about feminism justify the existence of feminism.
Haha I enjoy this one! :)
Is that a setting somewhere? Because that is not how it behaves on my end. Deleting a comment hides all replies.
No, I don't want to delete others comments. I want others' comments to not be deleted when the original commentor deletes the original comment that starts a comment thread.
This is what I want. How can I get this?
Happy to. Thanks for the welcoming words!
Crimson writing utensils with political double entrendre potential were seen on wooden furniture.
Thanks and welcome, comrade!
Join in and contribute to sharing and disussion of left video content at BreadTube. The more the merrier!
Edit: formatting
The video directly addresses this, commenting about why regardless of the singers prsonal views, the song is being championed by conservatives and criticized by leftists.
The video describes the rural/urban divide and dicusses how it was explained by Marx and Engels long ago. In doing so, the creator emphasizes the difference in material situations and interests. It explains false consciousness and why the reactionary focus on blaming the poor on welfare is counterproductive for actually solving the issues that the singer is describing. The creator does this not to say that his level of income makes him right, but to highlight the common reasons for this difference.