peopleproblems

joined 2 years ago
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He even has his own theme song!

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Grown without the nueral components for awareness, thought or pain"

Somehow I doubt that

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I never thought I'd see the items in a shopping cart double in price so quickly, but here we are

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

My ESD sense are freaking out right now

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Wait hold on

Wouldn't that mean that lenders have a vested interest in keeping borrowers alive especially if they have extreme net debt?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's going to make a lot of people upset. I don't recommend doing that.

But then again, I can use reasoning to gauge whether a certain action will have a certain outcome.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is Comic Sans ADHD friendly?

If you have ADHD you know that nothing is friendly. Or everything can be. Or something that triggers feel good becomes interesting and good. Maybe you know why you asked the question, maybe it doesn't matter. Maybe I forgot why i started answering this in the first place.

Point is maybe?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I would think the only way they could fight China effectively is by being the extremists that these militants aligned with. Which unfortunately means the CCP is going to crack down harder on anyone remotely affiliated :/

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Correct.

When it comes down to the necessary facts, it's a numbers game. There are so many more pissed off people than there are in power and wealth. They'd essentially have to massacre incredible amounts of people without destroying their own means of making income.

Guess how much a health care insurance org makes without people to insure?

$0. Interestingly, the same amount we believe it should make with people to insure as well.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, that makes sense too.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 34 points 6 months ago

I would think that the title of CEO might not be appropriate to every organization either. I know a rather big org where the CEO is basically someone who begs for investors, and the CAO does what a CEO usually does. There are orgs where that's the CFO, or the COO. Regardless of the title, it's all executives we're angry about because of the incredible income disparities versus actual responsibilities.

The executives I've met are essentially hype men or thumbs up thumbs down types. All of them were finance types or management types. To me, if your only qualification is many years of managing with barely any experience in the actual product/service your org provides, then that's a problem.

Hospitals run by management types? Engineering services run by accountants? It's all middlemen extracting piece of the pie from the people actually doing the work.

As a society we need to purge the system of middlemen period. The internet made middlemen obsolete, yet they are still exploiting labor in ridiculous ways.

 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›