Because dmarc, DKIM, and SPF validate the domain against the sending server, not the address.
When i send from noreply@ at work, it passes dmarc, DKIM, and SPF, because the recipient mail server validates the message came from an authorized mail server for the domain (mosty based on dns entries).
Without that validation, you can certainly still send emails, but most clearnet mail hosts will drop your messages. Google, Microsoft, and yahoo at the bare minimum will
can you drop the header in here: https://mha.azurewebsites.net/pages/mha.html
it might have some more info for you
Im assuming he meant the virtual desktop vuesure yeah. Exactly what you mentioned. Its been on linux for decades but windows added it with 10
I think there are windows containers available, but even M$ has given up pushing windows server for cloud native stuff. All their tutorial docs for containers use linux haha
All linux! I think debian, though they have alpine images too.
I wouldnt wish windows containers on my worst enemy haha.
I use the dotnet/sdk image to build and publish into the dotnet/aspnet for runtime since it's smaller. Both from mcr.microsoft.com
Software devs have a lot of technobabble haha!
I saw one of these. Have you used it? Does it work okay?
What ui do you put on? Kodi? Or do you just run a full fat deskop environment?
I've done this in the past. I was mostly interested to see what others have done
This is also true in the US. Its very important
No you can totally modify mail headers anytime you want to, just be prepared to get mail rejection if you're not following current mail security best practices.
I'd recommend just renting a cheap vps from vultr or something, then you can setup your mailserver to send from anything you like. That's how my mailserver works. I pay like $3 a month, and its plenty of space for a single user mailserver (i have like 3 mailboxes)
I did go through the work to setup dkim/dmarc/spf. Took a weekend, but wasnt too bad. My mail is received by gmail yahoo and Microsoft. I imagine doing the same with onion addressing would be complicated.