You can't say that and let us curious, which one in particular? I just started watching it and I got hooked. Looking forward to reading theories once I finish my binge watch
how it handles the load exceeding capacity
As in what happens if you plug too much stuff that it exceeds your solar production?
I'll use mine as an example, but it might be different with different models and configurations:
Inverter can handle up to 10kw
If solar production is at 5kw, and home is demanding 7kw, in my case, I have it set up as to draw the remaining 2kw from the battery, if battery is depleted, it will draw 2kw from the utility company
If home demands more than 10kw that the inverter can handle, it will trip the internal inverter protection or a circuit breaker leading to it
We already have hybrid inverters that does that automatically, you don't even need a different circuit or special outlets. It can manage all the grid ties, off grid and battery parameters on the fly
Subscribe! That would be quite interesting to follow along in future updates, if you don't mind sharing
Unfortunately they usually do it on farmland around here, when they could easily go the agrivoltaics route. They would only need to raise it a meter or two and let the sheep roam around doing the trimming for them
Depending on location, it would have been cheaper to have those posts raised/reinforced in the first place instead of buying and hauling all that gravel
This one actually grinds my gears and it is too popular around here:

But the other stuff is nasty. Total of petrochemicals in a tyre is above 60%. That fabric, carbon black, oils, elastometers, textiles, antioxidantes and additives are all based on petroleum too
That was a great watch. If anyone else has any other movie/series recommendations like Perfect Days (2023), let me know
They are already doing that, they even have a playbook on how to try to protect them, but apparently, “Physical protection is a set of structural measures that do not guarantee the safety of protected objects. Solutions do not exclude blast load and shrapnel impact.”
| Solution | What It Is | Rosneft’s Own Admitted Weakness | |
|
|
| | Cable barriers around tanks | Cable/net mesh (40×40 cm) wrapped around storage tanks on pipe stands | “NOT resistant to UAV shrapnel”; only protects against multirotor drones | | Scaffolding cages | Modular metal scaffolding erected 5m above tank roofs | “Insufficient volume of scaffolding to protect the Company’s facilities”; “high cost” | | Shipping container walls | 20-36m high walls from stacked 20/40-ft containers with cable infill at 40 cm spacing | Not yet pilot-tested; requires thousands of containers per refinery | | “Tent” canopy over tank farms | Overhead cable-mesh tent using containers as structural supports (21m central mast) | “Difficulties during firefighting”; “high snow loads” | | Tower crane mast cages | Repurposed crane sections forming 4-pillar cage around processing units, cables at 1m spacing | Each unit requires individual engineering; relies on surface foundations or guy-wires | | Three-barrier column protection | Layer 1: cable screens 1-1.5m out from platforms; Layer 2: nets (40×40 mm mesh); Layer 3: kevlar/aramid wrapping | In case of detonation, destruction is inevitable | | Cable fencing for pump stations | 6mm cables at 500mm spacing on outrigger brackets | Only designed to destroy drone airframe — does nothing against the warhead | | Reinforced concrete panels | Reinforced Concrete wall panels replacing sheet-metal wind barriers at pump stations | Only covers pump stations — the narrowest, lowest-value target category |
These older models are quite serviceable, so I'm surprised to hear that. lol
Did it weld shut together by being exposed to the elements? Do you know the model/year? Is it from the 60s?
You are not making it any duller at all. That deserves its own post to be honest

I'm no specialist, but I'll give my two cents. Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong or a better approach is available
Yes, even galvanized steel will eventually rust when directly in contact with the ground and it was accelerated by the salty air from the coastal region. It also rusts faster in high humidity air/soil. Even after sealing the roof, it will rust again from capillary humidity from the soil if laid directly against it
Concrete or rock footing around 10-20cm above ground level is what I usually see, make sure the water drains and it isn't pooling between footing and post. Those stirrups are usually galvanized steel, but if your post is already galvanized steel, I guess it wouldn't make sense in your case
Based on the first image, if you were to use a concrete footing above ground, you might even be able to salvage this post, as the two screw holes look unrusted on the picture, and they seem to be around the level you'd need to cut. You might need to grind down the area and look on the inside to confirm it. If it is, you won't even need new brackets
Otherwise, yes, a local shop will probably have some 90° brackets and bolts too. Keep in mind to accommodate the requirements for hurricane/flood/frost if your region is prone to it