Sorry for the ambiguity. What I mean to say is that the language this general is using very clearly indicates that the US has plans in place that have been decided on prior to any serious engagement. To call it a “prediction” is a poor choice of words. Thanks for assuming I’m a conspiracy nut you guys. Also, not everyone lives on Lemmy and can respond instantly. Whether you like my comment or not it is not cool to speculate on someone based a one-word statement.

Crop dusting chem trails …

The only thing I see social doing well is amplifying messages via cheerleaders and providing a channel for servicing the external client.

Toward my comment or the article?

I’m not sure if this comment is sardonic or sarcastic or genuine in tone so I can’t respond.

I certainly hope this person is really in marketing. I would agree that a lot of digital “metrics” are a scam. It’s all in the presentation of said metrics.

However, this article is comprised of poorly-sourced anecdotes and full of buzzwords and conjecture. The grammar also makes me question the validity of the storyteller.

I can’t gate-keep “marketing” but buyer beware on this one.

Edit: hey to all the downvoters - I’d love to know why, specifically, I am wrong?

I defer to you then. Thanks for sharing 🙂

That’s my guess - a coordinated effort to look weak to root out any issues with the clans that run each area. Loyalty check and you get to fuck with the West’s head a bit. If Putin wanted him dead he’d already be dead. There are useful idiots out there and Putin loves to look better than everyone else around him. Reminds me of a former US President …

What will you do when that entire thing tips and crushes you under it?

It is hard enough to love yourself without wondering if people secretly think your body is vile

Been looking for a donate link for this specific instance as well.

Tried to get some work done before tomorrow’s holiday here in the US. Made dinner for the kids. Spent some quality time looking at beans here on Lemmy.