Sam isn't exactly denying the original claim, here.
frezik
joined 2 months ago
Because the lesson they took away from the French Revolution is that if you make a strict class separation where "well bred" people are different from "dirty peasants", the peasants will eventually cut your head off.
If they pretend "we're just like you, and through hard work, you can become rich like me", then peasants will line up to defend them.
You must like cleaning balls.
That's a myth that should die out. It used to be true, decades ago, but not anymore.
The PS/2 protocol interrupts the CPU and sends a packet. USB has the CPU poll the connection and then gets the packet. However, the polling and clock rate of USB is so high that it can hit it several times before the PS/2 is done transmitting a single packet.
NKRO is also no longer an issue in newer USB versions. You have to get a more expensive keyboard to make it work--cost of all the diodes adds up--but that was just as true of PS/2.
Here's a Ben Eater video that goes over the details with an oscilloscope: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdgULBpRoXk
IIRC, that's electrically compatible with the smaller, more fragile PS/2 connector. The adapters are just wiring it down to the smaller connector (and maybe some impedance matching resistors?).
We won't, but for specific, self-serving reasons.
In his opinion for Dobbs, Thomas listed several cases he wants to revisit, including Obergefell. Notably absent was Loving, which is the case that set interracial marriage in stone. Thing is, if you follow his reasoning, Loving should fall to the exact same logic. The fact that he left it out is telling.
Roe and Casey were litigated until someone decided they should get a redo.
And it's not like the companies will update old stuff, either. They've shown a willingness to forget about old games as soon as the revenue dips too much. The result will be that those games will be unplayable in the future.
Who could have foreseen that letting game companies into the kernel would cause problems?
Yup, it's better. You're underestimating how inefficient biological processes are and how carbon intensive food production is.
https://eponline.com/articles/2023/01/13/environmental-impact-of-bikes-and-e-bikes.aspx
There are a range of numbers that depend on how you get your power and how you get your food. The high end of CO2 per km traveled for ebikes is the same as the low end for regular bikes.
This doesn't account for all the other terrible stuff coal puts out, of course.
Now, again, the numbers are close enough that it's barely worth quibbling about, but it is a difference.
Neat, so it's like nature's own little Conway's Game of Life.