blackbelt352

Even in greyscale the piss yellow of ai generated slop shows through.

Blender has an add on project called cad sketches in development. It's free to use and is donation supported just like Blender is. I haven't used it myself but it wouldn't hurt looking into it.

https://www.cadsketcher.com/

Jesus fuck you're so predictable. You just cantnhelp but double down on lies. You keep talking about all these books that have graphic content but refuse to give so much as a title of any of these books actually exist. Either give some examples or go away. Nobody believes your bullshit.

Nope I've seen the conversations and every single time they play out as follows.

Conservative commentor: "ban porn books in school libraries!"

People with more than 1 brain cell: "sure what books are pornographic? Tell everyone which books are porn."

Conservative commentor: "I won't tell you the titles because you should already know because the conversation has been happening"

So yes i have been paying attention to ThE cOnVeRsAtIoN, and nobody on the side of banning books from libraries ever gives any details as to what is or isn't pornograpic and why. Gee that sounds familiar, almost like this is exactly what you've done, you conservative freak.

Now you can either fuck off and leave everyone alone or you'll double down on the lies and keep making nonsense gesturing at windmills you think are giants without ever providing any evidence that you're correct.

Well that one mark ended up making 13 of the comments in just this comment chain alone. 14 including this one I'm making, on a post with 50 comments on it, over 20% of them. If this were any other massive platform like reddit or Instagram or Facebook, this level of engagement would drive algorithms extremely effectively.

Downvote all you want, that doesn't change the fact you're a liar.

Then prove it.

Engagement bait for other platforms that are engagement algorithm driven fishing for this exact kind of comment.

See here's the thing, it's not my job to prove your argument correct. So if you aren't going to take the time to defend your own point, why should I take the time to do it for you?

No titles to prove these books were inapropriate? Then stop posting and stop lying that these removals and bans aren't just targeted attempts at censoring authors writing about non-cis non-het non-white topics.

This is literally Palazzo Braschi in 1930s Italy.

Valid point, the Star Trek universe is not without its dark history and calamitous events, still the Federation, for all its flaws, its evil admiral problem, and Section 31, even shortly after the atomic crisis, it's still a society that has solved poverty and homelessness on their own planets and eliminated most medical annoyances, like the common cold and headaches.

And even the Ferengi the cartoonish caricatures of unrestricted capitalism are quaint compared to the horrors that capitalism of the real world present day.

We have all kinds of branding on socks about all the SpEcIaL sWeAt WiCkInG tEcHnOlOgY for maximum sweat wickage, and yet companies can't make a sock that lasts as long as socks from 50 years ago. What the fuck are companies spending all their research on to make these apparently incredible socks that barely last a year or 2 before they wear themselves thin? And then because they're these super proprietary blends of synthetic materials, any repair job is going to be a pain in the ass to make even as good of a repair as decent quality cotton socks from 50 years ago.