WoodScientist

joined 1 month ago
[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 21 points 13 hours ago

Yup. "Autism" is simply the new "Untermensch."

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago

I'm in your home right now. I can hear you breathing. You'll never find me.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 9 points 15 hours ago

Please. At least use his full and proper name, Secretary of Transportation Booty Judge.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 42 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It sounds like he's confusing autism with cerebral palsy or severe Down syndrome.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 24 points 1 day ago

I also went to Buenos Aires. I had my face rebuilt there!

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 42 points 1 day ago

because then anyone could put garbage in the receptacle.

This is when you're so capitalism brained that you're willing to shoot yourself in the foot. So much unnecessary complexity, so many ways for things to break, all just to keep a random pedestrian from throwing a sandwich wrapper in a random bin. So concerned about someone getting a service they 'don't deserve' for free that they would rather live in filth than just eat the minor cost and live in a sanitary city.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This just screams good old-fashioned political machine corruption. The garbage collectors are unionized and have a good bit of political influence. It seems like NYC has been running its trash collection as a make-work program for years. The only advantage of doing trash this way is that it means you need to hire way more garbage collectors than you would with other systems. I'm all for having well paid jobs and providing people opportunities, but there are ways to do that without creating a huge public health nuisance.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago

Instructions unclear. Mistakenly sexually propositioned every trans person I now.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, not sure where you're at. But if you're in the US, relying on insurance, and you want surgery, you should move Heaven and Earth to get it done as quickly as possible. The way this admin is going, insurance coverage is a very unstable thing right now.

[–] WoodScientist@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact. The black market price for progesterone in bulk is about about $200-500/kilo.

 

A question for the home brewers out there who know a lot of chem. One of the biggest problems with home brewing is verifying that the raw active ingredients you order are in fact what you ordered. You order estradiol enanthate or some other ingredient from a manufacturer, and an unknown white powder shows up at your door. There are crude testing methods available like the melting point test, but they are limited. There are also testing services like janoshik out there, but they're expensive and involve shipping samples internationally. With shipping, testing a single specimen with a service like janoshik can be $100-$200.

I know dedicated dedicated optical spectrophotometers like these exist. While accurate, these units are big, bulky, expensive, and not really suitable for the kinds of simple compact labs home brewers use.

I stumbled across this video describing a little cheap spectrometer available from a small shop in China. The videos I can find of it only show measuring the spectra of various light bulbs. However, I'm wondering if it's possible to use such a device to measure the purity of specimens of estradiol enanthate and other HRT medications.

I'm not an expert in spectrometry by any means, but I am aware of the general process. With a dedicated desktop spectrophotometer, you create a calibration/standard curve by measuring the spectrum of solutions of different concentrations prepared with a sample of known purity. Then you use that curve to measure the concentration of your unknown specimen.

But the big desktop units are designed from the ground up to do this. You place solutions in dedicated transparent cuvettes. Everything is in a single fixed unit designed for this purpose.

But is it possible to do something similar using just a simple spectrometer? Could you maybe buy such a spectrometer, bolt it to a surface, and cobble together some means of holding a cuvette? If you could fix the cuvette, light source, and detector a fixed distances from each other, then perhaps you could use such a device to cobble together a basic simple optical spectrophotometer?

Would this actually work? My thought is that while this wouldn't be the most accurate spectrophotometer out there, ultimately it doesn't matter. The goal of testing raws is not to measure their concentration to four significant figures. The goal is simply to verify you have the right compound and to ensure that it hasn't been cut with fillers. Even if such a setup had an error rate of a few percent, this would still be perfectly acceptable for raws testing.

I hope I'm explaining this question well enough. I'm really just wondering if a simple cheap usb spectrometer like this one here could be used or modified into a device that can measure raws concentrations.

view more: next ›