You know you could've just said you were an Etsy witch, and no one would have any further questions.
Umechan
What's your fault? His itchy anus?
yOu'Re TaKiNg HiM oUt Of CoNtExT!
That's what makes it so hilarious. They're fighting accusations of him being heartless with a fake quote of him making a terrible argument based on a false definition.
Posts video of them wearing a nazi armbands and a klan hood while saying it
You're taking that out of context.
Posts full video
But he was friends with Candace Owens!
Anything short of "I hate all black people and want to see them enslaved again" is not good enough evidence for them.
The thing is that people like this make the bar for proving it so high that an explicit confession is the only acceptable form of proof.
Talking about "prowling blacks" isn't racist, because he wasn't saying that about all black people. Saying successful black women like Ketanji Brown Jackson lack brain processing power isn't racist or misogynistic, because those comments weren't aimed at all black women. Accusing Target of grooming children for having family friendly pride merchandise isn't queerphobic, because he doesn't have a problem with LGBT+ who aren't groomers. Saying Taylor Swift must submit to her husband isn't chauvinistic, he just has traditional beliefs. It's only evidence if he openly says he hates all black and queer people and women are inferior and must therefore be treated as property.
I have too many things to say about this. Charlie Kirk was part of the media. He also spewed far more dangerous accusations about LGBT+ people being groomers.
It also calls for “stringent penalties for social media companies that censor information unfairly.” Obviously calling out content for being bigoted, fascist, or racist won't be protected from censorship, but I assume saying bigoted, fascist, or racist things will.
This feels like a good place to remind everyone that the people who said queer people should allow the genocide in Gaza to go unapposed are now demanding we respect a man who accused us of grooming children.
there are tens of millions of Charlie Kirks
Kinda reminds me of all those videos on YouTube that are like "100 Gokus vs 500 Harry Potters. Who will win?"
He'd probably hate this.
Were the comments that he was an excellent debater or always argued in good faith?