Tl;Dr they all failed because they're init daemons and not entire system management daemons. Article gave a nice description of the different choices but I gave up reading after runit because the reason for failure always boiled down to
It's only an init daemon
Honestly people are making a big deal out of this but I don't get it, the time for the outrage was when both AMD (2023) and Nvidia (2022) introduced frame generation into their respective upscalers. It was always gonna be downhill from there.
You make a good point, yes the government needs surveillance reform but we also need better data broker laws
Technically that segment is not a com file. They are MZ exe files. com files have no metadata or header
The interpreter is then executed in unprotected real mode for full privileges. Good thing I'm running sudo from real mode so it can elevate me to real mode
I still use them exclusively lol
resizepart 1 128 Instead of 128GiB ...bad day
Tbh I wouldn't trust a script that repartitions my storage even if it wasn't written by AI.
Honestly to play devil's advocate, California's law almost is the lesser of 2 evils, if software can ask the OS for age verification then maybe companies will stop rolling out actually invasive verification, and if the OS verification is handled by the sysadmin then it satisfies both sides, people that want to have age verification, and people that think it should be left in the hands of parents as a parenting role. Me personally? I'd rather we have no verification at all but that isn't the path the world is moving down.
Are the https requests being sent to an IP address assigned to node B? If so you either need an nginx reverse proxy on node B or NAT with port forwarding.
This is a really interesting idea. As a fellow developer I like the sentiment, what licenses exist that are anti kyc?
I would think most distros that use glibc should work, steam and pretty much all games don't care about the init system. I personally use devuan and have had no issues.