Scoopta

joined 2 years ago
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago

Are the https requests being sent to an IP address assigned to node B? If so you either need an nginx reverse proxy on node B or NAT with port forwarding.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is a really interesting idea. As a fellow developer I like the sentiment, what licenses exist that are anti kyc?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

Google figured out the translation for me lol...and yes I know I made your point... although as I said in another comment I do try to be noob friendly...that just only applies to noobs.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago

LMFAO, I do try to be friendly to noobs...but I am naturally a pedant and so when not dealing with noobs I let the pedant out a bit more. But I do agree with the sentiment that the power users are not welcoming.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Computer engineering is typically hardware and low level software design which doesn't really fit the analogy you're going for.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Screw with AI scrapers? Maybe, screw with my ability to read the sentence without active effort? Definitely...and it's annoying as hell

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The web is not open source by definition, I mean sure in theory it is but if you've ever tried to reverse engineer minified js I'm not sure it's all that much better than dalvik bytecode. It is easier to re than native code...but then wasm exists so again is the web that much better?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it just me or does its top bar with the settings n stuff hide behind your notification drawer so you can't do anything other than click start scanning?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago

Oh god, as if I wasn't scared enough about running a filesystem that got kicked out of mainline and is maintained more or less by a single dude. I'll stick to btrfs thanks

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago

Me: we're on PCIe 7 now????

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With x86 Macs I would agree they do...but with the ARM Macs...I'm not so sure. They're so unique hardware wise it starts to depend on how you define PC. If you define it as the acronym "Personal Computer" then a Mac is always a PC regardless of what you run on it. If we're talking IBM PC then modern Macs are never that. (I think the latter definition is generally more helpful as otherwise PC vs Mac makes no sense and phones become PCs etc)

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Never mind the fact that you can also run Linux on a Mac...I agree with this pet peeve

 

Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?

 

TIL that apparently capital one was assigned the entire 2630::/16 block...which is the largest assignment I've seen to date. Does anyone know of other absolutely massive allocations...are there even any others this large?

 

I've been using duckduckgo for years ever since I degoogled but I'm increasingly annoyed by its complete lack of IPv6 connectivity. I use NAT64 and so it works fine but it bothers me to use services that don't have v6. Does someone have a good non-google IPv6 search engine that's privacy respecting?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Scoopta@programming.dev to c/ipv6@lemmy.world
 

I'm curious about something so I'm going to throw this thought experiment out here. For some background I run a pure IPv6 network and dove into v6 ignoring any v4 baggage so this is more of a devils advocate question than anything I genuinely believe.

Onto the question, why should I run a /64 subnet and waste all those addresses as opposed to running a /96 or even a /112?

  1. It breaks SLAAC and Android

let's assume I don't care for whatever reason and I'm content with DHCP, maybe android actually supports DHCP in this alternate universe

  1. It breaks RFC3306 aka Unicast-prefix-based multicast groups

No applications I care about are impacted by this breakage

  1. It violates the purity of the spec

I don't care

What advantages does running a /64 provide over smaller subnets? Especially subnets like a /96 where address count still far exceeds usage so filling subnets remains impossible.

 
 

This has been my setup for a long time now and I have to say I still absolutely love it.

  • Icons: Flat Remix Red Dark
  • Theme: Flat Remix GTK Red Darkest
  • Launcher: Wofi
view more: next ›