Scoopta

joined 2 years ago
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'll have to test that, I have 16C/32T so I'll try dropping my compiles down and see if I do get diminishing returns. Never really considered that. Also I do not use CCache, I'll have to check it out though because it does sound really useful.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 14 points 1 day ago

The IP suite is not nearly as neatly layered as OSI was and the OSI model doesn't neatly fit the IP suite since it wasn't actually designed for IP at all. In the IP suite layers 5 and 6 basically don't exist in the OSI sense, TCP handles things that are part of both layers 4 and 5 in the model despite being a single protocol, etc. The OSI model is often considered obselete as it just doesn't actually fit the IP world all that well but it's been around so long and does have uses in certain situations that it tends to stick around.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

No idea, I use mercurial mostly

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 11 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What does the ChromeOS of Linux even mean? ChromeOS is already Linux

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I have a friend who won't leave windows because of League...in fact when we work on projects together I often have symlinks in my repo and he won't even turn on developer mode to deal with them because it means if he wants to play league he has to restart his computer since it breaks the anti-cheat...so I have to make sure to desymlinkify any repo I expect him to clone...it's cursed how much of a hold a stupid game can have.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

That makes more sense and is...even worse tbh because that's actually enforceable and so obvious I don't know how I missed it. That would also probably impact Tor since those IPs are already heavily reputation damaged. The stuff governments have been pulling recently is just insane

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You good sir underestimate the stupidity of courts

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 11 points 4 days ago

😭😭😭😭

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

So what do you propose? Just not using a VPN? If you're that worried you can run a second public VPN on top of your private one. The point of the private one is to avoid ISPs outright blocking known major providers.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

C++, ew, no thanks, also where is C??

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If a company I have a paid account with asked me to verify my age they'd lose my subscription so fast their head would spin. Ultimately I'm just one person but if enough people feel the same way it could be a deterrent but in the grand scheme of things there probably aren't enough of us

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

As apex32 pointed out, it isn't about logging, it's about your ISP either ratting you out or outright blocking the domains and IP blocks of major providers and that's why I said you can setup your own. Ofc even hosting one yourself your ISP can probably still determine you're using a VPN through traffic analysis even if you're using TCP 443 to blend in but it makes it harder.

 

Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?

 

TIL that apparently capital one was assigned the entire 2630::/16 block...which is the largest assignment I've seen to date. Does anyone know of other absolutely massive allocations...are there even any others this large?

 

I've been using duckduckgo for years ever since I degoogled but I'm increasingly annoyed by its complete lack of IPv6 connectivity. I use NAT64 and so it works fine but it bothers me to use services that don't have v6. Does someone have a good non-google IPv6 search engine that's privacy respecting?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Scoopta@programming.dev to c/ipv6@lemmy.world
 

I'm curious about something so I'm going to throw this thought experiment out here. For some background I run a pure IPv6 network and dove into v6 ignoring any v4 baggage so this is more of a devils advocate question than anything I genuinely believe.

Onto the question, why should I run a /64 subnet and waste all those addresses as opposed to running a /96 or even a /112?

  1. It breaks SLAAC and Android

let's assume I don't care for whatever reason and I'm content with DHCP, maybe android actually supports DHCP in this alternate universe

  1. It breaks RFC3306 aka Unicast-prefix-based multicast groups

No applications I care about are impacted by this breakage

  1. It violates the purity of the spec

I don't care

What advantages does running a /64 provide over smaller subnets? Especially subnets like a /96 where address count still far exceeds usage so filling subnets remains impossible.

 
 

This has been my setup for a long time now and I have to say I still absolutely love it.

  • Icons: Flat Remix Red Dark
  • Theme: Flat Remix GTK Red Darkest
  • Launcher: Wofi
view more: next ›