Scoopta

joined 2 years ago
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 13 points 4 days ago

Me: we're on PCIe 7 now????

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With x86 Macs I would agree they do...but with the ARM Macs...I'm not so sure. They're so unique hardware wise it starts to depend on how you define PC. If you define it as the acronym "Personal Computer" then a Mac is always a PC regardless of what you run on it. If we're talking IBM PC then modern Macs are never that. (I think the latter definition is generally more helpful as otherwise PC vs Mac makes no sense and phones become PCs etc)

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 12 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Never mind the fact that you can also run Linux on a Mac...I agree with this pet peeve

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago

I use an offline manager and now I'm really glad I do

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

That's fair, I hardly ever use all because there's just too much stuff that I'm not interested in, but I can see how having multiple accounts would get very annoying.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Maybe I'm in the minority here but at least the communities I'm in, I usually only see one post and it's from this account. Like no one else has posted this in any community I'm subscribed to so I don't see it as spam at all. I will say the account posts a lot but I never get duplicates which means the alternative would be for the community to be a lot emptier. I guess I just don't see the problem.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Obviously most companies will join whatever meeting invite they get sent but all the meetings they've created with me are via meet (we normally use teams)

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I have had calls with SUSE sales reps because I'm in the enterprise space, can confirm they use Google meet and Google workspace in general. Still not FOSS, but not Microsoft.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

I feel the same, btrfs is such a core part of my system at this point it would be hard to go anywhere else

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

Oh my god, the worst part is I read it the lemmy way first and didn't notice the normie meaning until I read this comment

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Hi, I host a mumble server, if users are getting cert errors it is 100% the hosters fault and the error being shown to users is GOOD. Otherwise users could get man in the middled without knowing it. There is no excuse for users to get the error if the hoster is competent and has automated cert renewal setup correctly. And for the record automated cert renewal isn't much harder than it is for a website.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I feel like XMPP is under rated, I used it in the past back when matrix was super new and not really production ready. I'm now revisiting them and matrix seems highly centralized in practice even if it was designed to be federated. There aren't that many implementations and so many people use matrix.org as their homeserver. Definitely still thinking XMPP is the best option.

 

Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?

 

TIL that apparently capital one was assigned the entire 2630::/16 block...which is the largest assignment I've seen to date. Does anyone know of other absolutely massive allocations...are there even any others this large?

 

I've been using duckduckgo for years ever since I degoogled but I'm increasingly annoyed by its complete lack of IPv6 connectivity. I use NAT64 and so it works fine but it bothers me to use services that don't have v6. Does someone have a good non-google IPv6 search engine that's privacy respecting?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Scoopta@programming.dev to c/ipv6@lemmy.world
 

I'm curious about something so I'm going to throw this thought experiment out here. For some background I run a pure IPv6 network and dove into v6 ignoring any v4 baggage so this is more of a devils advocate question than anything I genuinely believe.

Onto the question, why should I run a /64 subnet and waste all those addresses as opposed to running a /96 or even a /112?

  1. It breaks SLAAC and Android

let's assume I don't care for whatever reason and I'm content with DHCP, maybe android actually supports DHCP in this alternate universe

  1. It breaks RFC3306 aka Unicast-prefix-based multicast groups

No applications I care about are impacted by this breakage

  1. It violates the purity of the spec

I don't care

What advantages does running a /64 provide over smaller subnets? Especially subnets like a /96 where address count still far exceeds usage so filling subnets remains impossible.

 
 

This has been my setup for a long time now and I have to say I still absolutely love it.

  • Icons: Flat Remix Red Dark
  • Theme: Flat Remix GTK Red Darkest
  • Launcher: Wofi
view more: next ›