Scoopta

joined 2 years ago
[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago

Tbh I wouldn't trust a script that repartitions my storage even if it wasn't written by AI.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago

Honestly to play devil's advocate, California's law almost is the lesser of 2 evils, if software can ask the OS for age verification then maybe companies will stop rolling out actually invasive verification, and if the OS verification is handled by the sysadmin then it satisfies both sides, people that want to have age verification, and people that think it should be left in the hands of parents as a parenting role. Me personally? I'd rather we have no verification at all but that isn't the path the world is moving down.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Are the https requests being sent to an IP address assigned to node B? If so you either need an nginx reverse proxy on node B or NAT with port forwarding.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is a really interesting idea. As a fellow developer I like the sentiment, what licenses exist that are anti kyc?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Google figured out the translation for me lol...and yes I know I made your point... although as I said in another comment I do try to be noob friendly...that just only applies to noobs.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

LMFAO, I do try to be friendly to noobs...but I am naturally a pedant and so when not dealing with noobs I let the pedant out a bit more. But I do agree with the sentiment that the power users are not welcoming.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Computer engineering is typically hardware and low level software design which doesn't really fit the analogy you're going for.

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Screw with AI scrapers? Maybe, screw with my ability to read the sentence without active effort? Definitely...and it's annoying as hell

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The web is not open source by definition, I mean sure in theory it is but if you've ever tried to reverse engineer minified js I'm not sure it's all that much better than dalvik bytecode. It is easier to re than native code...but then wasm exists so again is the web that much better?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it just me or does its top bar with the settings n stuff hide behind your notification drawer so you can't do anything other than click start scanning?

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 16 points 2 weeks ago

Oh god, as if I wasn't scared enough about running a filesystem that got kicked out of mainline and is maintained more or less by a single dude. I'll stick to btrfs thanks

[–] Scoopta@programming.dev 13 points 3 weeks ago

Me: we're on PCIe 7 now????

 

Are there any currently available RISC-V dev boards that support the H extension for running KVM?

 

TIL that apparently capital one was assigned the entire 2630::/16 block...which is the largest assignment I've seen to date. Does anyone know of other absolutely massive allocations...are there even any others this large?

 

I've been using duckduckgo for years ever since I degoogled but I'm increasingly annoyed by its complete lack of IPv6 connectivity. I use NAT64 and so it works fine but it bothers me to use services that don't have v6. Does someone have a good non-google IPv6 search engine that's privacy respecting?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Scoopta@programming.dev to c/ipv6@lemmy.world
 

I'm curious about something so I'm going to throw this thought experiment out here. For some background I run a pure IPv6 network and dove into v6 ignoring any v4 baggage so this is more of a devils advocate question than anything I genuinely believe.

Onto the question, why should I run a /64 subnet and waste all those addresses as opposed to running a /96 or even a /112?

  1. It breaks SLAAC and Android

let's assume I don't care for whatever reason and I'm content with DHCP, maybe android actually supports DHCP in this alternate universe

  1. It breaks RFC3306 aka Unicast-prefix-based multicast groups

No applications I care about are impacted by this breakage

  1. It violates the purity of the spec

I don't care

What advantages does running a /64 provide over smaller subnets? Especially subnets like a /96 where address count still far exceeds usage so filling subnets remains impossible.

 
 

This has been my setup for a long time now and I have to say I still absolutely love it.

  • Icons: Flat Remix Red Dark
  • Theme: Flat Remix GTK Red Darkest
  • Launcher: Wofi
view more: next ›