Microsoft will just make a subscription AI for that, BaaS.
the price the govt offers tends to be way way way cheap sometimes even impossible for manufacturer
I read what it said about aspirin, but the UK pays around £1 for 100 for that, so the idea it could be made in China for less than a cent per pill doesn't seem impossible.
It sounds like the issue is with companies with poor QC being allowed to bid in their reverse auction system, rather than the system in itself.
For UK customers, if a product is defective, such that it loses a feature it was advertised as having, you potentially have up to six years to claim in small claims court.
It's not whataboutery, my point is that they're portraying it as something terrible, when it has worked (mostly) fine in the UK for years.
It's obvious sinophobic framing, that the nasty reds are doing something to harm their people, when we do exactly the same.
If what instance you chose truly didn't matter this wouldn't be as big of an issue. Unfortunately defederation causes a tangled mess of netsplits.
Doctors say they believe the country's drug procurement system, which incentivises the use of cheap generic drugs over original brand-name pharmaceuticals, has led to costs being cut at the expense of people's safety.
The irony of the BBC posting this when the NHS does exactly the same.
Trump postponed the removal of the de minimis exemption. I assume because someone managed to tell him it would cause a complete standstill at customs with how much paperwork it will cause. People were facing $35 paperwork charges on $1 packages. It would also cripple American R&D since it relies heavily on getting part samples from China, as does what's left of British r&d
I've heard of people buying tiger poo to deter cats from their garden, this doesn't seem that much different.
They make swimsuits that are dry clean only, so shoes you can't actually walk in doesn't surprise me.
Two of the worst people in America fighting.
Twitter, facebook, et al, claim their arbitrary censorship and algorithms are not editorialisation, so they are not "publishers".