PhilipTheBucket

joined 2 months ago
[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

America: We're going to make a whole department, we can't just have unauthorized cats everywhere

Mediterranean: "Hi, I am street cat, I'm gonna commandeer your beach towel and eat the fish I caught. Later we can hang out if you want."

Oh, the dipshits will arrive. Don't you worry. 😃

And yes, I agree, I like the culture of Piefed. Let's see how things play out.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Chin up lad. This is just the boss fight. After this, it gets easier again.

(And yes, the people who figured they were doing a big favor for Palestinians and American Hispanics by not voting against Trump are foolish people who helped to cause all of this. I'm not mad but I am disappointed.)

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lol what that person said absolutely isn't true. Sorry, you're jumping in the deep end of Lemmy drama. So posts on lemmy.world which are (for example) trashing the Democrats for participating in Trump's takeover and being mainly concerned about preventing the "shutdown" as if that's the worst thing, or posts criticizing Israel for, you know, trying to wipe a whole race of people off the map, are super-popular.

For example take a look at this post. You will find a majority saying "about fucking time," and a minority saying Bernie is pro-Israel and that's a bad thing. You will find no one supporting Israel in any capacity (which of course is as it should be). The pretense that there's anyone on lemmy.world who is pro-Israel aside from a tiny handful of angry shouters who are probably trolls, is just that.

So that parent comment is actually a perfect example of what I was talking about setting up rules about "factual claim" for the politics community. In my perfect world, if someone comes in and says some kind of out-of-pocket stuff like that, and someone else asks "What are you even talking about how is lemmy.world pro-Israel, can I see an example?" and the answer is more or less "blblblblblbllblblblblblfdglfdglblblblb fuck you," that first person gets banned. I feel like that will reduce the temperature of the overall conversation a lot more than a lot of the things lemmy.world mods spend their effort on. It might be complex in practice but I want to try.

Why it is that people constantly make this type of accusation, I don't know for sure, although I have some theories that I find compelling.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I kind of did it in a self-service fashion... a while back I unsubscribed from !politics@lemmy.world and !world@lemmy.world, and I had a much more enjoyable Lemmy experience, and then every so often by accident I would find myself in some kind of comments thread where everyone was angry, shouting at each other, accusation of "blue MAGA" and "oh you're just saying that because YOU'RE OKAY WITH GENOCIDE YOU'RE A FUCKING ZIONIST" and things like that. And I would think, what the hell happened here? And then I would see I stumbled into lemmy.world somehow.

Some of the smaller communities are fine, they can actually be quite nice. But the big ones are just a big pile of doo doo. And then the mods are just kind of wandering around tripping on their dicks and banning people at random, which doesn't add anything of any real benefit.

I will hope, but it seems a little unlikely. Somehow, the most craven ones seem to escape justice most of the time. It's the true believers who rush out to the front, people like Stephen Miller or Alina Habba, who tend to start to catch some strays as the shit hits the fan. The dude who's sitting in the back quietly doing 100 times more damage seems to eventually get away on a boat to the Seychelles or something. He might get impeached in 5 years, or he might live out his days secure in the knowledge that he can drive his fucking RV around and do whatever he wants.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Hm... so part of my concern about the "everything else" politics community is that I feel like it is guaranteed to not really get used all that much. There's always going to be !ukpolitics@feddit.uk or !europe@lemmy.dbzer0.com or !canada@lemmy.ca, I feel like pretty much all the political content that is put up by denizens of whatever part of the world is going to go into a region-specific place, and the "everything but the US" community just wouldn't get used.

I feel like the two obvious options are:

  • !politics@piefed.social which is for "anything" with a specific focus on political news, and in practice is 99% US politics
  • !uspolitics@piefed.social, which is for US politics only, i.e. the same thing but we have to have little disputes every now and then about whether something like Petro wanting to move the UN belongs there or not

I went with the first option. I really am fine with renaming it to !uspolitics@piefed.social, completely up to you. If it's the second option I feel like just deleting !politics@piefed.social unless someone has a use for it, to keep things clean, is probably better.

I do get the concern from the rest of the world that it's annoying to have US stuff as the "default" and everything else get put in its own region-specific "non default" category. Maybe uspolitics is a little more forward thinking in terms of getting away from that thinking (especially as the years go by and the US collapses in on itself like a rotten pumpkin, geopolitically speaking).

(And yeah, !world@quokk.au is fantastic, I like it. I sort of bounce between quokk.au and piefed.social currently in terms of my "main" account.)

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I get that. But also, 2 of the 5 stories I posted were not US politics stories. I would like to be able to post stuff about what's going on in the world without needing to sideline it if it isn't US stuff.

I do get what you're saying. Like I say, I'm just going to defer to letting the person who's organizing the top-level communities on piefed.social have the final say. I did add a "US Politics" flair, to make it a little easier to block US Politics stories if that's what people want to do, but I feel like more likely the people who don't want US politics in their feed are just going to block the whole community regardless which is completely fine (and I categorized it topic-wise accordingly).

Like I say, I do get it, I'm just deferring the decision to someone else instead of you and me arguing back and forth about it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why do you want to refer to Rimu about the name, while you didn’t consult him in the first place to create this community?

Because I wasn't intending for it to "go live" yet, I just didn't fully grasp what it would mean to leave the box checked to publish to other instances. I mean it's fine, I don't see a reason to delay now that it's published, but I had intended for more discussion and populating it with content before making it fully live.

It didn't even occur to me that the name would be an issue. I'm open to the idea. Like I say I think it should be instance owner's call at the end of the day, since "politics" is kind of a naturally heavily iconic community. I was actually a little bit surprised that there wasn't one here already. I'm fine changing it if the judgement is that it should have a different name.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Oh, I didn't realize it was going to make a public post about it before I had a chance to populate it lol.

Hm. I'll defer to @rimu@piefed.social about the naming. To me, "politics" while allowing politics from any country is fine, but I'm American so maybe that is just my exceptionalism. I generally follow the Beehaw conventions, they seem to strike a really good balance of short concise names without being overly chauvinistic about it.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I 100% agree with this. Lemmy is infested with politics communities but somehow every single one of them seems like it has some kind of flaw or other. !politics@beehaw.org and !politics_no_um@lemmy.world are probably the best in my opinion, but I think they are maybe not ideal only because they're both not federated to big chunks of the community. !politics@lemmy.world is absolutely godawful for multiple reasons. I actually was talking with @blaze@lazysoci.al about having half a mind to create one, to try to do a better job with it.

I just made !politics@piefed.social because your post inspired me to do something about it. Take a look at the sidebar rules and let me know what you think. I'm sure I am signing myself up for some kind of pain, let's see how it goes. How well does what I put there line up with what you were thinking in terms of how you wanted to organize the rules? I actually put specifically to allow video / image posts because of what you were saying... I might change my mind about videos just because there are already a couple of "political videos" communities and it really is a much different type of content.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The structure of the republic and the Constitution required political agents acting in good faith for the good of the citizens.

There is a 0% chance that that keeps happening. The structure of the republic required the ordinary people of the United States to be vigorous about making sure that their political agents were acting for the good of the citizens, and putting them in danger (electoral or otherwise) if they were not.

It worked, and we got complacent because things were working, and so we slid away from that and into this idea that they're supposed to just because they're supposed to. And look where it got us.

 

By Nomada, September 9, 2025

The District Prosecutor’s Office in Kielce has confirmed the launch of an investigation into possible aiding and abetting, as well as approval, of genocide and crimes against humanity by representatives of Israeli arms companies present at the MSPO arms fair. The case was initiated by a complaint filed on September 3 with the involvement of the Polish-Palestinian initiative KAKTUS; proceedings are being conducted in rem (under Articles 118 and 118a of the Polish Penal Code). So far, two individuals have been questioned, and part of the Israeli delegations left the fair before its conclusion. We call for a thorough and transparent investigation and for an end to cooperation with entities profiting from violations of international law.

 

Seg1 epstein3

Amid growing pressure for the Trump administration to release the full Jeffrey Epstein files, a New York Times investigation reveals how the country’s largest bank, JPMorgan Chase, enabled Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation and profited from its ties to him. The exposé is based on more than 13,000 pages of legal and financial records. The Times reports JPMorgan processed more than 4,700 transactions for Epstein totaling more than $1.1 billion, including payments to some of the women who were sexually trafficked. The bank “arranged for Epstein to be able to pay those victims, both in the U.S. and in Eastern European countries and in Russia,” says David Enrich, deputy investigations editor for The New York Times. Epstein “operated in large part because he had unfettered access to the global financial system. And for many years, it was JPMorgan that was providing him with that access.”

 

A man sits near a damaged building in Afghanistan after a magnitude 6.0 earthquake in Afghanistan

An earthquake in Afghanistan killed over 2,200 people last Sunday, with some rural villages still unreachable by rescuers. | Wakil Kohsar/AFP

By the time the earthquake struck, flattening mud-brick homes across Afghanistan’s eastern mountains last week, many nearby health clinics had already been shuttered for months.

Mushtaq Khan, a senior advisor for the International Rescue Committee, felt his building jolt from all the way in the capital, Kabul, on Sunday night. He woke the next morning to a horrifying death toll slowly trickling in. First, 200 lives lost; then 500; 800; 1,000; and finally, by Thursday, there were over 2,200 confirmed deaths, with some rural villages still unreachable by rescuers.

As his team searched for survivors, he wondered what could have happened if the gutting of the US Agency for International Development hadn’t forced four of their clinics in the country’s hardest-hit province to close earlier this year, cutting off 60,000 rural Afghans from care.

How many lives could be saved if the emergency aid came rushing in like it did before? If the roads had been built in time, or if the food assistance was at the ready like it used to be, they could have surely reached more people more quickly in the disaster’s wake.

“The way we are responding now would’ve been way different,” he said.At the beginning of this year, the US cut almost $1.8 billion worth of aid to Afghanistan. Because of those cuts alone, the country’s GDP will likely shrink by a full 5 percent this year, cutting off food, shelter, and medical care for millions of Afghans. In 2022, after a magnitude 6.1 quake hit southeastern Afghanistan the US gave $55 million for food, health, and sanitation supplies. The next year, it gave $12 million in the wake of yet another earthquake. But this time, the US offered nothing.

Globally, we are at risk of unraveling decades of progress in making disasters less deadly, driven by investments in infrastructure, early warning systems, and better coordination between the patchwork of actors and agencies that kicks into gear when crisis strikes. Foreign aid has always been a critical part of that puzzle in low-income countries like Afghanistan. A steady flow of foreign aid helps facilitate the kind of development — the roads and resources — needed to make emergency response truly effective when disaster strikes.

The US isn’t alone in slashing aid. As a result of the worldwide retreat in funding lifesaving development programs, every disaster is now deadlier than it needs to be — and every aid worker is left navigating an increasingly dysfunctional system.

“The resources are really, really scarce right now,” said Khan. If the money was there like it used to be, he told Vox that he “would be on the ground working side-by-side with my team right now. We are really feeling the difference.”

How disaster relief works

When an earthquake or a cyclone strikes a poor village, what normally happens first is that the country’s government puts out a call for international relief.

Then, a hodgepodge of NGOs, United Nations agencies, and foreign governments would spring into action. USAID would typically pledge a few million dollars to the government of the affected country or — as would be the case for an unfriendly ruler like the Taliban — to a United Nations agency or humanitarian organizations like the Red Cross working on the ground.

Sometimes, the US would even lend out one of its highly specialized search and rescue task forces to respond to a disaster overseas, as it did to Haiti, Turkey, Peru, the Bahamas, Nepal, and Japan after earthquakes, flooding, and hurricanes over the past decade.

The coordination would kick in really quickly. Most humanitarian organizations didn’t even wait for the contracts to be signed before flying their teams straight into the epicenter to work with local agencies and nonprofits on the ground.

After decades of collaboration, most humanitarian organizations trusted that “the US government would pay its bills” or reimburse them eventually for the costs incurred, said Jeremy Konyndyk, who ran USAID’s disaster assistance branch under the Obama administration and now leads the advocacy group Refugees International. By having those relationships at the ready, a response can kick in much faster when disaster strikes.  “Sometimes you need the relief to move faster than our grant processes.”

That trust didn’t come overnight, nor did USAID’s capacity for responding quickly to global disasters, he said. Over time, “it evolved and it grew and iterated,” he said. “It became this really amazing professional operational, deployable machine.”

What makes the most difference in the immediate aftermath of a disaster is not an injection of emergency donations. It’s not as simple as crowdfunding a search and rescue team. Instead, long-term infrastructure projects — often fueled by foreign aid — are what really wax the wheels of disaster relief, ensuring that help can come as fast and efficiently as possible.

It’s important that the protocols are already in place and the rescuers are already on call to respond effectively by the time disaster strikes. But, it’s equally important that the clinics are open, the roads are paved, the water is clean, and the houses are strong enough to withstand some damage.

Achieving those goals through global cooperation has been extremely important for low-income countries, where disasters are still far more deadly than in rich countries, despite efforts to improve early warning systems worldwide.

But, they have made progress, which helps explain why earthquakes, cyclones, and floods used to kill far more people a century ago than they do today, despite there being way more people now, more data reporting, and more disasters tied to climate change than before.

The new math of who gets saved

But now, with the death of USAID and plenty of other countries taking sledgehammers to their own aid agencies, everything about disaster relief has gotten a lot more sluggish.

The Taliban, which seized power in Afghanistan in 2021, put out an appeal for aid shortly after the earthquake struck at the end of August. So did the leader of a local rebel group in Sudan last week, after a devastating landslide killed over 1,000 people in a region already ravaged by war and famine.

While a few countries have stepped in to help in the aftermath of the earthquake — including the European Union, China, India, and the United Kingdom — aid workers like Khan say the absence of the US is directly impacting their response. “It’s just a complete mess,” said Konyndyk. “As a functional matter, the US government is simply out of the business of disaster aid globally,” and “it’s done huge damage.”

Those search and rescue task forces the US used to send? They’re still technically on retainer, but in what Konyndyk called an “entirely insane” twist, the Trump administration cancelled the emergency transport contracts that used to get them where they needed to go — meaning that it’s now basically impossible to get them overseas, especially on a time crunch.

It took four days to get those task forces to Texas after the floods this summer — the same first responders that made it to Syria and Turkey after the 2023 earthquake in justtwodays.

The USAID subagency that once handled global disaster logistics has been quietly subsumed into the much smaller office within the Office of Refugee Resettlement as part of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Not that it seems to be doing much anyway. After a magnitude 7.7 earthquake killed 3,800 people in Myanmar back in March, the US was mostly absent in the disaster response. The UN’s human rights expert for Myanmar recently told the Associated Press that a mixture of aid cuts and the notable absence of US logistical support has severely hampered the country’s ability to recover.

A number of monks stand in front of a collapsed building surrounded by rubble from other collapsed buildings around them.

Previous earthquakes had led to the deployment of a full US-led rescue team with dozens of rescuers, search dogs, and heavy machinery that could pull people out alive. This time, the US flew in a team of just three aid workers to assess the damage and then promptly fired them all via email mere days after their arrival as they slept in the rubble-strewn streets of the earthquake zone.

The situation in Afghanistan is even worse. After the Taliban’s takeover, the US remained the country’s largest source of aid by far, sending billions to the poverty-stricken country over the past four years.

The Trump administration’s decision to slash the vast majority of aid spending cut the country off from urgent food aid, forced the closure of about 400 humanitarian health clinics40 percent of the country’s total — and gave girls even fewer options to go to school.

“You just name any crisis — we are seeing it over here,” said Khan, who’s especially worried about how damage to water and housing infrastructure could increase the prevalence of disease and make it impossible for families to weather the coming winter. It would be one thing if this were the only crisis on his plate, but the earthquake is only the latest in a series of crises, including a severe drought that has left about one-third of the population facing acute food insecurity and the millions of Afghans forced out of neighboring nations.

“These are very resilient people,” he said. “They just need backing.”

A recipe for disaster…or relief

Saving more lives is about more than money for any individual disaster; it’s about addressing a brewing logistical nightmare that’s making the world less safe and far less prepared to respond to all different kinds of crises.

Take Sudan. Western media didn’t even report on the deadly landslide that occurred there — which destroyed an entire village — until two days after the disaster hit. And, the ongoing civil war makes it extremely difficult to get humanitarian aid inside the country anyway, particularly in the region most affected, where many have sought refuge from the violence precisely because the area is so remote.

But almost unthinkably, the destruction of USAID — which funded the bulk of humanitarian relief that did make it into the country — has made things even worse. It ruptured longstanding relationships, unceremoniously firing some of the only people with the logistical expertise needed to navigate such tricky terrain. No matter what comes next, it won’t be easy to build back.

“We are facing a huge loss of capacity and trust,” said Patricia McIlreavy, head of the Center for Disaster Philanthropy, who has spent decades working in humanitarian aid, including in Sudan.

“There may be others who fill those gaps. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, it’s just a real unknown,” she said. “How will it look? How will people get support? Will they get support?”

In the meantime, she fears that all of the “cuts in funding, but also cuts in capacity, and cuts in expertise and relationship-building” could have dire consequences long after the dust settles.

“People on the ground in Sudan, people on the ground in Afghanistan, don’t have a vote on any of these changes,” she said. “All they know is nothing is coming.”

At the end of the day, natural disasters don’t see borders. There’s something very human — apolitical, even — in the impulse to support one another in the wake of such tragedies.

Afghanistan offered $100,000 to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Mexico sent dozens of firefighters to Los Angeles when wildfires broke out earlier this year. Hundreds of Canadian workers descended on North Carolina to help restore power after Hurricane Helene.

And with climate change accelerating the pace and intensity of natural disasters around the world — but especially in places like Afghanistan and Sudan — like it or not, we are all in this together.

Granted, the US used to anchor a vast global emergency response infrastructure, and individual donations are absolutely no replacement for that.

But in Sudan — where local volunteer networks have managed to bring lifesaving relief to places that many western donors gave up on years ago — anything is still better than nothing, especially if you choose to support for the long haul. The same is true in Afghanistan, where aid workers have trudged for hours in search of survivors to pull from the rubble.

“We all have a belief that help will come, and when we erode that hope, I think we do something to who we are as people,” said McIlreavy. “How are we advancing together if we can’t believe that we are somehow there for each other?”

 

Four masked men in police tactical vests surround a young scooter rider, cuffing his hands behind his back. One person, whose face is fully obscured with a cap, sunglasses and a balaclava, is heard on eyewitness video telling the scooter rider: “You came into this country as a J1, as an exchange student. You didn’t show up … You lied, ok?”

“Yeah, he’s illegal, either way,” another person is heard saying, before they lead him to an unmarked car.

Screengrab from a video showing a man being arrested by federal agents along Florida Avenue Northwest, Washington DC on Tuesday, Sept. 2. Source: Instagram/@will.allendupraw

Nearby, two Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) cars are seen blocking part of the lane. Uniformed MPD officers stand around the area, neither intervening nor appearing to participate directly in the arrest.

MPD vehicles seen blocking part of a lane where federal officers are arresting a man on a scooter along Florida Avenue Northwest, Washington DC on Tuesday, Sept. 2. Source: Instagram/@will.allendupraw

The video was posted by Will Allen-DuPraw, whose profile says that he is a photographer and videographer based in DC, on Sept. 2. Allen-DuPraw wrote in the post that bystanders reported that authorities were stopping Latino men on scooters along Florida Avenue Northwest, a major road in Washington DC, and had arrested two.

An urgent alert sent out on the morning of the same day by Stop ICE Alerts, a community-driven alert network for those affected by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids, reported similar information. The alert said that ICE, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) – a branch of ICE focused on investigating transnational crime – and MPD were “stopping Latinos on scooters” and had arrested one or two people along Florida Avenue Northwest.

A Metropolitan Police officer directs traffic at a checkpoint on New York Avenue after US President Donald Trump deployed US National Guard troops to Washington and ordered an increase in the presence of federal law enforcement to assist in crime prevention, in Washington, DC. Source: Reuters/Al Drago

With US President Donald Trump’s crackdown on immigration, scenes of federal agents detaining people while accusing them of immigration offences have been cropping up all over social media from around the country. An analysis of ICE arrest data by DC-based think tank Cato Institute found that in June and July alone, ICE conducted almost 9,000 street arrests nationwide of immigrants who had no criminal convictions, charges, or removal orders. About 90 percent of these were immigrants from Latin America.

The incident on Florida Avenue Northwest was one of 42 that Bellingcat and our partner Evident Media geolocated and verified using videos and photos from social media and news reports. These showed federal agent encounters in the capital, in the month or so since Trump’s federal takeover of DC on August 11. The full dataset can be downloaded here.

In the three weeks after DC was placed under federal control, Trump’s administration said more than 300 people without legal immigration status were arrested in the District.

Like previous immigration raids that we documented in Los Angeles, the federal agents involved in the DC cases were often masked and in military wear. Some wore generic “Police” vests, while others had attire indicating specific government entities such as ICE and HSI. The vehicles they used were usually unmarked, with plates from a variety of US states.

Car plates from a variety of US states that federal agents in DC were filmed using in Washington DC. Source: Evident Media

There is one key difference, however. In LA, a state law prohibits local law enforcement from using its resources for immigration enforcement in most cases. But in DC, where no such law applies, MPD has frequently been seen working with federal officers since the federal takeover last month.

In half of the incidents in our dataset, local DC law enforcement could be seen working alongside federal agents. Most of the DC local police were from MPD, though some were from the Metro Transit Police Department. Aside from ICE and HSI, agents from federal agencies including the US Park Police, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) were also seen in the videos.

Agents from US Park Police, FBI, DEA and ATF were seen in the videos. Source: Evident Media

“We are definitely seeing MPD cooperate at a level we’ve never seen before, and it is resulting in people getting arrested and sent to detention,” Michael Lukens, who runs immigrant rights centre Amica, told Evident Media.

MPD has not replied to Evident Media’s queries about their cooperation with federal law enforcement agencies as of publication.

Of the cases we analysed, 22 involved the arrest of delivery drivers or tradespeople, such as workers in an air conditioning and heating truck.

In two widely shared videos, DC resident Tyler DeSue claimed agents pulled over his Uber Eats driver for having “incorrect tags” on his bike, then checked his registration and insurance and saw it was valid. DeSue said they then asked for his immigration status and detained him.

Police officers, one in an HSI vest, seen questioning a man in a video posted by Tyler DeSue on Aug. 17. Source: TikTok/@td13__

The videos DeSue posted did not show the initial encounter between the agents and the driver, but did show the arrest. DeSue can be heard in one video telling agents that the man they were questioning did not understand what they were saying, and they should use Google Translate. Another witness is heard calling the arrest “ridiculous” and questioning if the agents have “better things to do than to harass Uber Eats drivers”.

In a second video, also posted by DeSue, agents are seen wrapping the man in chains before putting him in an unmarked car.

A second video posted by DeSue on Aug. 17 show agents wrapping the man in chains before putting him into an unmarked car. Source: TikTok/@td13__

Another video posted by NPR reporter Chiara Eisner on Aug. 21 shows an agent in a “Police” tactical vest handcuffing a man in front of a truck, with US Park Police nearby. When Eisner asks what is happening, a Park Police officer says this is a traffic enforcement because the man was driving a commercial vehicle on park roads.

US Park Police stand by as a man is arrested by an agent in a “Police” tactical vest, after what they said was a traffic enforcement for driving a commercial vehicle on park roads. Source: TikTok/@chiaraeisner

Evident Media asked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) about videos of these two specific incidents, as well as whether federal agents were using race or language as factors in their stops and arrests. In response, a DHS spokesperson said:

“What makes someone a target for immigration enforcement is if they are illegally in the US – NOT their skin colour, race or ethnicity. America’s brave men and women are removing murderers, MS-13 gang members, pedophiles, rapists – truly the worst of the worst from our communities.”

The spokesperson also claimed that the men detained in these two incidents were undocumented immigrants who entered the country illegally. They did not mention any other criminal record for the men or comment on why the men were stopped by local police in the first place.

Lukens told Evident Media that ICE agents had been seen in areas with larger immigrant populations, such as Columbia Heights and Adams Morgan, which he described as “high-level racial profiling”.

Constitutionally, the Fourth Amendment protects anyone in the US, regardless of immigration status, from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government.

“If you are an ICE officer and the only thing that you have to fall on or to fall back on in justifying arrest is a person’s racial makeup and what vehicle they are driving, then you have conducted an illegal stop and an illegal arrest,” Lukens said.

Melissa Zhu, Eoghan Macguire, Pooja Chaudhuri, Kolina Koltai, Vladimir Zaha, Fraser Crichton and Bonny Albo contributed research to this piece.

From Evident Media, Jennifer Smart, Kevin Clancy and Zach Toombs contributed to research and production for the video report.

Bellingcat is a non-profit and the ability to carry out our work is dependent on the kind support of individual donors. If you would like to support our work, you can do so here. You can also subscribe to our Patreon channel here. Subscribe to our Newsletter and follow us on Bluesky here and Mastodon here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›