NotAnOtter

If an AI was provably 100% correct then I guarantee you people would listen to it.

People seek for god & other higher powers for much less reasonable logic than "a machine that is always correct no matter what".

The reality is AI as it's known today (generative stochastic models) can not ever reach "100% correct", by definition of being a generative stochastic model. So you're essentially discussing a fantasy computer that we are not close to every having IRL -> It's not relevant.

I'm not sure if there is some subtext being lost, but if your point is that we should trust AI with how to 'save us', then why aren't you following it right now? It's perfectly happy to offer an answer and it will even sound very convincing. But there is no reason to think it actually has the correct answer, or even knows what the problem is.

I'm convinved the whole "Super intelligent" thing is just to give him a response whenever asked about AI. He doesn't understand it nor it's risks, he just knows the people bribing him care a LOT about it. In recent interviews whenever someone asks him about AI he just talks about the """""rebrand"""""" to SI.

It's a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.

There is no reason to trust AI's reasoning on what could "save us" even if it offered one.

Brother, please, proof read your posts before pasting a wall of text.

Second - I generally agree racist terminology is infuriating but what I find way more infuriating is how some people don't think it's racist. I still see clips of Fox anchors & other conservative spokes people refer to "Dirty rats", "Illegal aliens", or even just "terrorists" when discussing someone who overstayed their visa. Which is hateful and racist, but what feels underhand is their belief that it isn't racist or hateful. You don't call someone a "dirty rat" or an "criminal alien" if you're discussing a factual matter objectively.

bananas share 55% DNA with humans

This fact is mildly infuriating to me. It only holds up when considering fundemental building blocks of DNA, which sure, DNA at a fundemental level functions the same for all life. The part that makes DNA meaningful (The ordering / "data") has almost no overlap of a banana. "Harry Potter & The Bible have 90% of the same words, they're basically the same book" if you exclude ordering...

Cruel and unusual punishment is flatly unethical, no debating it.

I know all the polling indicates a blue wave but I'm worried people are getting over confident about it :/. I'm hoping it's as intense as people are assuming but I'm expecting for them to barley take the majority and still need to bargain on every issue,

Even the implied accusation is pretty weak.

So he went to a game in the same city where a person you could have plausibly conspired with lives? Like a major sporting event which it is common to travel for?

If he is banned from traveling to any city where a potential conspirator exists then that rules out basically every city in the US, certainly DC is included in that list.

Yes that is literally his plan. Put out constant bullshit headlines about deranged stuff like this, so you become exhausted and stop paying attention. And then he steals billions from his various crimes.

He’s on tape saying as much.

Suddenly accelerating has killed a couple people.

It's especially bad when different parts of your body accelerate in different directions.

Brilliant insight.

• Not every weird interest is autism
• Not every habit that disrupts your productivity is ADHD
• Wanting things to be tidy / clean / organized is not always OCD

In 2000, mental orders were under discussed. In 2015+, people are obsessed with labeling themselves as some sorta broken.

Statistically most of you guys are just slightly nerdy, lazy, and picky. Not autistic / adhd / OCD.