LainTrain
Voted for them as opposed to who? Zack didn't have our back last election exactly, it was them vs reform & Tories odds are it may come down to that again if the press finds dirt on Zack. I'm trans so trust me I don't love the paternalistic red tories, but I don't personally blame anyone for voting for them.
Wild. I wonder what airbus did differently that it affects them in particular? Like why are their systems more exposed to solar radiation than any other plane?
You wanna uh, give some context? Post some clips, a link, anything at all? What the fuck is Leni lol. What were the points? What is the "lemmyverse"? I thought you meant Lemmy but then you said "(maybe not me)", which I thought you meant as in - you're not an admin on Lemmy, but that doesn't make sense either - are you an admin or not?
I swear people's writing these days is so odd, especially those on the older side, like as if it starts in the middle of an already ongoing thought or something, and is based on context we not only don't have, but there is no possible way we could have even if we knew the startalk you're referring to or if you linked it, because you don't even mention who the involved groups are. You sound like my boss who might as well speak in riddles lol.
This really sucks. GDPR is extremely important for our way of life online and this is a crucial defense against privacy invasions of behalf of the corpos. Is anyone trying to stop this shit? We can't have beligirent lobby groups backed by assorted anti-democratic bastards write our laws like it's D.C.
The starting point for this attack on user rights is a debate in Germany about people using GDPR access rights in employment disputes, for example to prove unpaid overtime. The German government chose to label such use as “abuse” and pushed in Brussels for sharp limits on these rights. The Commission has now taken over this line of argument and proposes to restrict the GDPR access right to situations where it is exercised for “data protection purposes” only.
What the fuck, Germany? I thought you were good. This is some AfD-tier shit.
In practice, this would mean that employees could be refused access to their own working-time records in labour disputes. Journalists and researchers could be blocked from using access rights to obtain internal documents and data that are crucial for investigative work. Consumers who want to challenge and correct wrong credit scores in order to obtain better loan conditions could be told that their request is “not a data-protection purpose” and therefore can be rejected.
Insane
Let's see them then. What were the social media comments in question? The article talks about "conspiracy theories" and "denying sexual violence", so I'd like to see what exactly those comments were because to me this doesn't just seem like what you'd expect, so I'd like to see it before I dismiss it.
Both things are good. If they're gonna be here they need to pay more and/or come less
Couldn't come soon enough
Yeah but that's the thing they're in completely different circles. They might as well be from another planet to us lol
Eh, idk, but to me rogue one is still whatever honestly, that movie is peak nostalgiabait for the most part with a serviceable plot that keeps things moving like a series or short levels of Jedi Knight or something so you can keep munching popcorn, and the cinematography and setpieces are actually really good.
Sure it's now even more fun because the characters are fleshed out in a primetime TV drama that came out years later and I do rewatch it more often because of that, but it's like saying revenge of the sith flows well with clone wars S7, nah, not really, there's an island of quality between the two.
Been a while since I distrohopped heh