Because he’s the leader of the nation. An essential component of good leadership is the ability to inspire others.

The fact remains that there is no other option which is shameful.

Okay I’m missing something what is the count to 600 reference?

Mid 20s… poor sweet summer child.

If you live in a state that’s not contested, sure vote third party if that makes you feel better. But the reality is that not voting blue in any purple state does benefit the party you are less aligned with. So in the case of a leftist it would benefit republicans. I also would love an alternative to a two party system but in THIS election a vote that benefits republicans is a vote for a 1 party system.

I really enjoyed the game when it was first released in early-access on steam. The ability to play through the story with a friend was unique and fun. Unfortunately the Crema team stopped having innovative ideas and just released their version of Pokémon systems. At the time it was nearly impossible to communicate any negative criticism because of rabid fans on the subreddit and devs who seemed to have no interest in communicating with their player base.

Republicans being “better” at the economy is a myth. They still sell themselves as the fiscally responsible party but in modern history the economy has grown more under democratic leadership and democrats have taken on less debt (less expansion of the deficit). But despite the data here you are spouting party rhetoric.

And as far as social agenda… that’s all the modern republican part is, various witch hunts and cancel culture.

I really cannot stand fandom sites. It always lacks content so pages are filled with useless information such as links to review sites. Also, it’s an atrocious experience on mobile.

Seems interesting to me. However, I agree with some others on the forums that the names for the quality levels are kinda dumb. Would prefer something like the crude, good, excellent, perfect, etc.

This is fantastic and unexpected news!

I don’t know why I’m wasting my time with you. But that’s simply not the point made by OP. Not all charity is bad. “Charity” by the grotesquely wealthy for the purposes of manipulating their public image and tax evasion, is bad. It’s a grift that placates those on the receiving end without ever doing enough to change the underlying causes of their suffering.

That makes you a troll.

You know nothing about this person and have no evidence to make this claim. All you’re doing here is attacking their character rather than the argument.