AtmosphericRiversCuomo

I thought you can't send usable information via quantum entangled particles?

They're trying to convey that the footage contains images of blurred dead people, not that PL died. Gave me a heart attack at first tho.

When I started my CS career, I didn't care for it at all for almost an entire year until I found my niche language, then I started to really quite enjoy it. Just learn as much as you can now, expose yourself to a wide breadth of stuff if possible. And yes, you need to upskill on your own. Get super good at what you're doing, work on side projects etc. while you're young, then you can take your foot off the gas after a couple years when you break into mid level.

Prob missed the tax filing deadline and just said fuck it. Seriously, the US makes you file for life even if you don't live there. Only country in the world like that afaik.

Weird shit out there these days. Glad you were able to overcome it. Take care of yourself.

Yep. I'd do it in a heartbeat. These folks are heroes.

Right, this result (if confirmed) makes either of those much more likely.

I refuse to believe ET doesn't use radio for something though, even if they're emitting some kind of signature on accident.

Really hope this is true, but to me, this would just create more questions than it answers wrt intelligent life. The Fermi paradox is still in effect, basically. If there is life that close to us (even single-celled), that implies the universe is absolutely lousy with life, and therefore we should be constantly picking up electromagnetic radiation (radio waves) from other advanced life. Yet we're not.

Because the sun's magnetic field pulled iron-rich particles inward during the planet-forming process, causing Mercury to accumulate a much higher proportion of metal compared to rock.

As you say, hallucinating can be solved by adding meta-awareness. Seems likely to me we'll be able to patch the problem eventually. We're just starting to understand why these models hallucinate in the first place.

Anthropic's latest research shows the chain of thought reasoning shown isn't trustworthy anyway. It's for our benefit, and doesn't match the actual reasoning used internally 1:1.