"We need morals back": Lauren Boebert preaches Ten Commandments on Bannon podcast (www.salon.com)

submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is from a woman who, according to her own biography, throws beer cans at homeless people, drinks and drives...

... and named her 'emotional support' hamster...

Mountain Dew.

Her... now former ... husband was 22 when he hit on her, a 16 year old, working at McDonalds. That is how they met.

If you just think she us a trashy hypocrite, actually read her autobio. Its fucking wild.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 19 points 4 months ago

She also jerks dudes off in movie theaters.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 29 points 4 months ago

Live theater, not a movie theater. The thing that is considered classy, artsy, and has people on stage that can see you jerking off your tinder date.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Her… now former … husband was 22 when he hit on her, a 16 year old, working at McDonalds. That is how they met.

Hey, I think it's important that we stick to facts here. Particularly when the facts are so very... I'm not sure what the term is. Let's just say that the facts are very Boebert.

First of all, he was 24 at the time and she was 17, and it wasn't a McDonalds, it was a bowling alley. Most importantly, I'm not sure it counts as 'hitting on her' when he took his dick out and flashed her and two other girls. He did time for it too, a whopping four days plus two years probation. It was after he got out that they got together. I guess it was a nice dick.

Anyway, just wanted to correct the record.

[-] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 months ago

Oh dear fucking God its actually worse than I remember.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 4 months ago

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

And she was a grandmother at 36, right?

Cool cool cool

[-] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago

If the GOP wants to bring morals back, all they have to do is stop being so amoral.

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 17 points 4 months ago

Agreed! I want to see MORE HANDJOBS IN PUBLIC just like Jesus intended!

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Make handjobs public again!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If people yell "PRAISE JESUS!" at the happy ending of a public handjob, that's very biblical and therefore, "moral", in the eyes of Bobo. Even better if it's a blowjob. Even better yet: PIV.

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 12 points 4 months ago

Perhaps she could start with her own.

[-] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

She's not exactly a shining example of morality. Just say'n.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Oh the irony

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Yeah, sure, bobo. Did she say that between handjobs?

[-] boatsnhos931@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

She meant we need orals back

[-] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

Well there is no commandment that says, "Thou shall not grab thy date's hog in a crowded theater on camera and in front of children. " I guess she is okay. Lol

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

The same "morals" as the fake-Jews, aka "Jews", who convicted Yehoshua "Jesus" ( Iosa, actually, not "Jesus", was his Roman name, apparently ) benJoseph..

Remember in the Christian Bible, Pontius Pilate tried to have Rule of Just Law win the case, but the "Republicans" of his day wouldn't tolerate that, and since Pontius Pilate didn't have the political-leverage to win, he just washed his hands, explicitly of the case, in protest..

What has changed?

These "Christians" are behaving exactly the same, in motivation, as their predecessors did:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+27%3A18-31&version=AMP

this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024

66 points (92.3% liked)

politics

19159 readers

4521 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News