167
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

...but grabbing people by their genitals, raising an insurrection, covfefe and hambderburs is? I.mean how could anyone not see he's an idiot?

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

He's the smartest Conservative they know!

[-] MrBusiness@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 months ago

Also Trump, the largest Conservative, simply eats the other Conservatives.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

* stares hungerly in Chris Christie*

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Why would I even need to electrocute the shark when they're going to naturally be repelled by all this bleach I have flowing through my veins?

[-] proper@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I mean it wasn’t eloquent by any means but it’s kinda clear he was trying to say “heavy ev batteries will cause your boat to sink, either electrocuting you or exposing you to waiting sharks”. Which of course if nonsense, but it isn’t really senile gibberish is it? He’s just trying to make ev seem like this evil thing “dems” are trying to force on “patriots.” Clunky for sure but it’s not like he’s just pulling random words out of the air.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 55 points 6 months ago

It's confabulation, which is what people do when they can't actually say something meaningful but feel an urge to speak. It's really common for people with mild to moderate cognitive impairment.

[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Which, as a non-American makes me wonder: what happens if this oaf is elected, but at some point turns out to be impaired to the point of non being able to hold the office anymore? Assuming the Republicans will ever acknowledge that, seeing how it feels like they'd support him even if he was swinging on the lamps while throwing faeces everywhere.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It has happened before--a former president was probably actually not fully cognizant and kept in hiding for a period of a year or so but his wife managed to fool Congress by sending letters in his name.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 6 months ago

There are two options: the first is that the people around him act in his name, and the second is that the cabinet declares him disabled under the 25th amendment, and puts the vice president in charge.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

You've just justified a whole lot of false equivalencies.

[-] proper@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I just asked if this article was being hyperbolic, I truly don’t understand how people are reading this as a defense of his statements.

[-] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Did you hear the portion of the speech immediately preceding the shark talk - he was glitching super hard and froze up on discussing military stuff. He only got into the shark battery talk because he couldn’t muster anything else.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
167 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2442 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS