this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
85 points (96.7% liked)

News

35692 readers
2768 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 44 points 2 years ago

Companies "colluding" to lower emissions:

GOP: Rabble, rabble rabble!

Companies "colluding" to gouge consumers:

GOP: (crickets)

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

NEW YORK, June 11 (Reuters) - A U.S. congressional committee will accuse the biggest Wall Street firms on Tuesday, in a report seen by Reuters ahead of its publication, of colluding with advocacy groups to force companies to shrink their greenhouse gas emissions.

...

The report says Climate Action 100+ "bullies asset managers to join" and presses them to use their shareholder votes in support of climate proposals, seeking to reduce fossil fuel extraction and raising energy prices for U.S. consumers.

Lobbying companies = bad.

Lobbying politicians and SCOTUS = good.

Now I get it. They're afraid of losing some of that cash.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Good job, GOP, you got em! They conspired to increase their own costs

[–] Coach@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

The Genocidal GOP strikes again.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

The report says Climate Action 100+ "bullies asset managers to join" and presses them to use their shareholder votes in support of climate proposals, seeking to reduce fossil fuel extraction and raising energy prices for U.S. consumers.

Going to guess that they cite fossil fuel representatives as the source for the bullying claims.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They.... They published a report... Saying that companies are colluding... to lower greenhouse emissions?

That's what republicans think is a valuable use of their time seated in positions of power and influence? Trying to stop companies from checks notes NOT harming all life??

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Next the GOP will be screaming to nationalize these publicly traded companies so the public has no say in how they're run.

Ceres said in a statement that the hearing is part of a larger political campaign to ban investors from considering climate-related financial risk.

...or maybe they'll codify in law that the only consideration is profit.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Next the GOP will be screaming to nationalize these publicly traded companies so the public has no say in how they're run.

For one, nationalizing would have the opposite effect. It literally means that the company is administrated by the people of the nation, and therefore they reap the profits/rewards. It also means they have more control.

Sure, an autocrat might try to use this to consolidate power, but the concept of nationalizing isn't inherently bad. It can be done correctly, and be a great boon for society.

Which is why, second, the GOP would never do such a thing. Wrest control of private corporations from billionaire capitalists that fund their campaigns and hand it to the people? Lol are we talking about the same party?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Brother, it was a joke.