I don't have hard sources, could probably find relevant ones if I reeeallly had to. What's interesting isn't sports' exclusion of trans people, rather the supposed eligibility threshold resting on having never undergone natal puberty, juxtaposed against scare campaigns around targeting children, along with the already significant hurdles faced in accessing treatment prior to pubescence anyway.

sport: no trans athletes that haven't undergone hrt before the age of 14
law: no trans kids can undergo hrt before 16
perfect system

It's also just another method of exclusion and its supporters know it

Mia Mulder's video has a full list of sources in the description, so that's a start.

Reuters article, abc article, paper on hormone therapy effects for athletes. Based on the material it should be apparent that there isn’t sufficient scientific evidence to justify bans on transgender athletes, unless the sport in question offers notable advantages.

the ioc's rules are hardly perfect (racism etc) but how many trans women have won olympic medals?

I think the biggest tell when it comes to people mad about trans women in sports, is they aren't also mad about trans men in sports. In fact, they have no problem with forcing trans men to compete with cis men, but they have a whole ocean of crocodile tears ready for cis women being "forced" to compete with trans women. Why the asymmetry? Because they want to pretend to be protecting cis women, who are idealized and treated as personal property and reproductive assets in a patriarchal society. Cis women are the source of future workers (babies) for the ruling class. Cis women are the source of domestic servants (house wives) for the ruling class. They must be "protected" from what transphobes imagine are simply men in drag. Notice how transphobes are always advocating for forcing trans women to compete with cis men to "protect" cis women, but are never advocating for forcing trans men to compete with cis women to "protect" cis men. It's an entirely lopsided ideology fixated on cis women as property as an ideological facade for discriminating against trans people. They won't even advocate a half measure like creating separate leagues in sports for cis and trans the same way it's already separated between men and women, adult and child, abled and differently-abled, professional and casual. Because to do so might incidentally grant more legitimacy to trans identities by admitting them to be categories, and that's the last thing they want to do. They want to ignore, bury, and discriminate against trans people without acknowledging them, or even resolving the contradictions of their own beliefs. Same goes for nonbinary, intersex, etc.

Gender ideology is when you teach children about gender. Gender identity doesn't begin developing until age 2-3, it begins to solidify at age 4, and it doesn't finish developing until the end of puberty.

I believe children below age 4 shouldn't be allowed to have gender. They can choose when they're old enough, and they can change their decision at any time. Of course there's no way to stop parents from gendering their children, but gendered pronouns should be kept out of the classroom until an appropriate age.

Trans athletes in women's sports: Is this fair? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ9YAFYIBOU

Radiolab Gonads