Oh wow the water wars are starting a few years earlier than I anticipated.
Mankind better watch out. Next it'll be air.
Oh, it's already being sold.
Those things are awesome. They weigh next to nothing, the small ones have 60 inhales in them, and a single hit is night and day when running at high altitude. A buddy didn’t have time to acclimate before a race, so we got him one as a joke, and it unironically helped him a lot
As Bo said, “Twenty thousand years of this, seven more to go.”
Texas should get ready for a ton of people heading north. Give a person a choice of dying from no water or going where there is water and we all know what will happen.
This will probably happen on a global scale. The southern hemisphere will be too hot at some point.
Is the Southern Hemisphere hotter than the North?
Yes. Well no, but yes. Hemisphere on the whole? No. Land in the hemisphere? No. Land in the hemisphere that isn’t Antarctica? Yes, it’s much more likely to be located closer to the equator. Of the 6 inhabited continents 3 (North America, Europe, and Asia) are entirely located in the northern hemisphere.
You have some areas like Patagonia that are akin to somewhere like europe, but the equator is lower on every continent it passes through than you probably think. The equator in South America is found in the Amazon basin. In Africa it’s in in the Congo and a bit above Nairobi (Johannesburg is the northernmost major city in Africa below the southern tropics). In the Asian sphere it passes through Indonesia. About half of Australia is tropical.
For another comparison the top of the Tropic of Cancer (northern one) is in the middle of the Sahara, below New Delhi, right above Hong Kong, and about in the middle of Mexico.
I assume it has to do with the fact that along the equator it's typically warmer and the equator runs through the northern part of South America. So if temperatures go up they'll go up there first and head north south respectively. I don't think they meant Souther Hemisphere as much as they mean Southern Mexico / South America.
I just watched a whole Astrum video about this. It's less about one being hotter than the other and more about the seasons being more extreme. The orbit of our planet is actually a little egg shaped, and the closest we pass to the sun happens to be in early January. In the north, due to our tilt, it happens during winter, giving us a more mild season. In the south, the opposite is true. They have hotter summers and colder winters than we do.
The Southern hemisphere gets more extereme seasons. Earths orbit is eliptical and the point where its closest to the sun lines up with southern hemisphere summer making it hotter (and making northern hemisphere winter milder) The same goes for winter with the earth being furthest from the sun roughly during winter in the southern hemisphere. As the earths axis proceeds this effect swaps hemispheres every now and then. (5000 years iirc?)
They are: haven't you noticed how much of a hard-on they've got for shooting and/or imprisoning border-crossers?
As a Canadian I am scared shitless for a future when a deranged America threatens us for our fresh water.
The world is fucked. This is just the beginning. Europe is also prepping for an increase in migrants from northern Africa.
People are going to die in the millions and unfortunately a lot of them will be poor and brown which means collectively we won't give a shit.
If Mexico implodes this summer, this could help the presidential candidate who works towards more CO2 emissions. Ironic.
I see nothing wrong with this speculation, from a US point of view: A wave of Mexican climate refugees from Mexico City could fuel the Republican propaganda machine tar Biden as being soft on the border, and help Trump. Even though sadly Republicans in the Senate are blocking a bipartisan Senate border security bill.
Although Mexico is having a presidential election too, which makes the statement somewhat ambiguous, although Mexico's election day is really soon on June 2nd, which is well before summer.
The year is 1325. Some Aztecs see a snake getting eaten by an eagle out on an island of a vast lake. They take this as a sign from the gods that they should build their city here.
2025: this once vast lake is now a metropolis with routine water shortages
The aztecs knew how to manage it properly. It was the dumbass Spaniards that fucked everything up and drained all the water away.
Ah, I remember back when idiots thought climate change meant the world would be under water. Turns out it actually means a lot less water will be available.
It will be either too much water or no water.
Edit: i just went to check how my country is doing water wise:
Germany is one of the regions with the highest water loss worldwide. Since 2000, the country has lost 2.5 cubic kilometres of water per year. In the years 2019 to 2021, record low groundwater levels below the long-term lowest groundwater levels were recorded at the measuring points in many places.
Seems we already know
Here’s data for other contries for those interested; https://www.wri.org/data/aqueduct-40-country-rankings
Less water where you need it and more where you don't want it.
Oh, places will be underwater.
It will be salt water.
They forgot the difference between drinking and non-drinking water.
It's all drinking water. You just don't get to drink one type for very long if you keep it up.
Some areas will be under more saltwater than now, like Florida and the Netherlands. Some areas will be inhospitable due to consistent heat and lack of FRESHwater like Mexico, Northern Africa, India, etc.
There is also a mix: salty water that won't submerge land permanently, but that will reach more and more inland across rivers during high tides. River Mekong comes to mind, along which rice is cultivated and that already now suffers from this phenomenon. Salty water on land means you will not grow anything there anymore. The Mekong delta produces rice that is used to feed an incredibly high number of people in Asia.
In Brazil there was a mega flooding in the south recently, I knew some people there and they said it felt very apocalyptic. This is most definitely not normal climate.
Also they found some arid (like desert arid) zones recently in Brazil for the first time. It used to be semi-arid.
I'd have been scrambling to build desalination plants and asking for help from the US.
Thirsty Thursday will take on a whole new meaning on June 27th.
Desalination on a small scale is fine.
Desalination on a large scale would be its own form of environmental catastrophe.
TBH transporting the water uphill from the sea would take an ungodly amount of power.
Maybe instead of powering AI with nuclear power, we power desalination plants and pumping infrastructure.
All AI will give is recipes made with glue and poop knives.
Water stops thirsty hordes from breaking down your gates.
Oh for sure, I've been advocating AI have to cover their own power as if it weren't subsidized by the government. We could just turn it off and that would be cool with me. I want it to be well known that this was my stance long before the water issues.
I don't know what covering their own power is supposed to mean.
They "foot the bill" capische? The cost goes to them. They pay money equivalent to the true cost of the goods they consume, above the rate at which a regular citizen pays for a good produced under a system of government subsidy and/or control.
Nuclear power has been declared double plus ungood by Greenpeace so if you try it they will sue you until you give up.
However, of all of the places, sunny Mexico wouldn't be the worst option.
wut?
It's actually pretty high on the list of worst opions, Mexico City has an elevation over 2,000 meters, surrounded by mountains over 3,000 meters tall above sea level. Access to the sun doesn't make this any more or less of a monumental task, it's assumed if they had that kind of energy infrastructure then they would already be using it.
I thought solar would be abundant. That's it.
So this is the Warning from Mexico I’ve been hearing about.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Experts say that Mexico City could run out of drinking water by the end of June, an event locals call "Day Zero."
Mexico City has long struggled to bring water to its millions of residents, but three consecutive years of low rainfall and high temperatures have created a serious emergency.
Conditions are so bad that the North American Drought Monitor classified the federal district containing Mexico City as "severe" on April 30.
The system normally moves about 15 cubic meters of water a second and provides service to about 22 million people.
About 40% of Mexico City's water is lost due to leaky pipes and other issues, the Post reported.
But rainfall might cause a "false sense of security," Christina Boyes, a professor at the Center for Economic Research and Teaching in Mexico City, told the Post.
The original article contains 438 words, the summary contains 137 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Those poor axolotls.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/