this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
129 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

15252 readers
1128 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/6800661

Transportation mode, World vs USA

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] harry315@feddit.de 46 points 2 years ago

Needed like five minutes just to understand the graph, but man it is packed with useful information. Data is indeed beautiful. And the mobility triangle in the US of A isn't.

[–] enbyecho@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I'm going to use this as an example of one of the worst visualizations I've ever seen.

Cool plot, would enjoy seeing specific cities rather than average, even if it clogs things up

[–] Mannivu@feddit.it 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'd like to see a map where the Netherlands are not included. We in Europe are not (always) car-centric but the public transport is awful in some places.

[–] zeluko@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

I mean the Netherlands arent thaat big to make a super big impact on that graph, so the comparison still stands.
But the graphic is not telling us which other "non-US" Cities are included to know how diverse the data used is.

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

I get the impression that Netherlands public transport is above average but not exceptional in Europe (although it depends on which countries you are comparing to). But their bike infrastructure is world leading.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Curious how the plots on the left would compare if it compared population densities instead of populations.

[–] SineIraEtStudio@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

I really like your idea. It would be great insight to have.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah, the graph on the left is the only one I question …. There’s not many cities in the US above 10M, and NYC has a lot of transit and walking users

Edit: I didn’t see any data source.

  • By strict city boundaries, no us city is 10M so that graph would be invalid
  • By Metropolitan Statistical area, only nyc and la are 10M, and Chicago is close, so I would have expected more than 10% walk/transit
[–] Zekas@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

How do we know these cities aren't cherry picked? The data seems a bit overwhelming.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The "794 cities worldwide" line in the triangle is not very representative, since almost half of those cities are taken from USA.