104

I have friends who are Afghan who have had arranged marriages so this led me to be curious to ask, why does this practice still persist into the 21st century?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 65 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's probably worth mentioning that an "arranged marriage" can mean anything from when two families agree to marry off their children without their children's consent, to when families play match-maker and set their children up on dates but their children get the final say.

In India, for example, you get both, with the former being more common in conservative, rural areas and the latter more common in urban and middle-class areas. So it's not a one-size-fits-all situation.

As to why it persists? Practicality, I suppose. If you want to get married, it helps if you filter out all the people who aren't serious about settling down. Plus it's not like love marriages have a superb success rate, given how common divorce is nowadays.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 36 points 3 weeks ago

In fairness divorce rates are high because of young people getting divorced because they realized they shouldn't have gotten married while they were still growing out of their early adulthood.

The only reason arranged marriage societies seem to have a higher success rate is because divorce is rare since who someone gets married to is often determined by family standing and the party who wants a divorce is often browbeaten into compliance to not jeopardize the benefit of that marriage tie.

Were divorce not so stigmatized that you yourself literally cited it as a failure metric of love marriages, arranged marriage societies would likely see even higher divorce rates than love match societies, as love match societies will exhibit low to moderate social pressure to seek marriage, while arranged match societies can feature families shopping suitors as soon as the kid hits legal age of consent, and maybe even before then if they're especially sprung on controlling their kids' life.

US divorce rates would be cut down by requiring a prenup to get a marriage license. Arranged marriage societies would see marriages and families implode across the land if abused spouses ever felt reasonably safe that they could divorce without being ruined for it either by their family, the courts, or the vigilante lynch mob their STBX calls up in retaliation for them trying to escape.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 12 points 3 weeks ago

The first scenario is called ‘forced marriage’ in English law and is illegal. Arranged marriage is consensual

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] answersplease77@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

in many cultures it's tradition like India, while in others it's a nessicity because it's illegal to look at, befriend or chat with any female

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

"it's tradition" isn't much of an explanation

[-] ribhu@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

What they mean is that there is a deep rooted segregation of men and women. Especially in rural parts of India, where you can get to your mid-20s without interacting with a person from the opposite sex (not from your family i.e.). There are no social settings where you can "meet people" and hence for marriage, arranged is the only way.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 weeks ago

"it's tradition" isn't much of an explanation

It's not a moral answer, but it is an accurate answer.

[-] One_Dunya@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

Endogamy is one of the practices that took root in Indian society as a way to enforce the caste system. Some scholars even call it the rationale behind the caste system. It's got it's roots in Hindu scriptures (not hating on the religion, but it does need reformation IMO).

To read more about one of the foremost Indian/subaltern scholars on this explanation (endogamy) - https://baws.in/books/baws/EN/Volume_01/pdf/20

P.S I think proximity to India, trade with India could have lead to the practice being observed in Afghanistan, but it also seems like Islamic clergy (majority practice this in Afghanistan) does not have entirely progressive views on this.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This book review (never got around to reading the book itself) made me understand why people think "it's tradition" is a valid explanation at least sometimes. I disagree still but i couldn't find any counterarguments.

https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/06/04/book-review-the-secret-of-our-success/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Drummyralf@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Not if your culture doesn't value tradition. Yet there are cultures where tradition is ingrained in it's value systems.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 33 points 3 weeks ago

Being real, it depends on what people think marriage is.

There's multiple concepts out there, which may or may not conflict with each other.

What really matters is the people involved agreeing on which concepts they will be engaging in. That's the truth no matter if it's arranged or not.

Now, when arranged = forced, that's some fucked up shit. But the two aren't inherently the same thing.

When it comes right down to it, "marriage" is just a word for a formalized union between people that is recognized by the community/state. How the people involved get there is kinda meaningless. A carefully arranged marriage in a culture where marriage is done for practical reasons is no worse of a concept than two random drunks in vegas getting hitched just because. It's not even a worse concept than two people that love each other choosing to formalize their bond (and it doesn't even have to be romantic love, good friends can sometimes a marriage make).

I'm not saying the culture in Afghanistan is good or bad. I do have my doubts that the marriages arranged are done so in a healthy and equitable manner, but that's a separate issue from assuming that arranged marriages are somehow a relic of the past and that it should die out. They still exist because people want them to.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 32 points 3 weeks ago

Others have already talked about the potential benefits of matchmaking, but not a lot of people have talked about marriage as a joining of families. There are lots of cultures where it's normative to live together with parents and grandparents (which if you think about it also means aunts and uncles, cousins, etc.). There are lots of benefits to people who live this way - greater financial stability, access to childcare, healthcare, increased lifespan, lower depression - and so it makes sense. If you are bringing someone new into the household, it may be important for the heads of the household to weigh on or even choose the person or the family.

[-] richieadler@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 3 weeks ago

I understand in theory the benefits. But I practice for me It would be a nightmare. Being unable to get away from toxic family members would be horrible. And being the outsider... I'm dating you, not your family. I find the idea of "entering a new family" worrisome and distasteful.

[-] AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know. There's an even chance my parents would have been better at picking my husband than I was.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] MrsDoyle@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago

I know a young man who headed back to India for an arranged marriage. I expressed my extreme surprise that he would agree to marry someone he'd never met, and he said he trusted his parents to choose someone compatible. "After all, they know me better than anyone else." I remain baffled, honestly. He seems an otherwise savvy, modern person. But there you go, happy to commit to a stranger.

I dread to think what kind of bloke my parents would have picked for me...

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 3 weeks ago

For starters my parents would not have picked my preferred gender to mate with...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Devi@kbin.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

You don't commit to a stranger really. Normally you've met them and spoke multiple times and the families have spoken throughout both kids lives. I had a friend when I was young who knew her intended spouse from 7 years old and there was no plan to marry until she was finished with uni. She used to carry a picture of him in her wallet like we all had boyband members.

Even once you get to the marriage bit there's chances to say no then.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

I have friends who are Afghan who have had arranged marriages

So what have they said to your question?

[-] NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

I can think of a lot of reasons. In a rural area, finding a suitable partner is tough. Why not let a web of adults help out.

[-] JewishLeftist@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Seems more like theyll choose someone to their liking over yours, no?

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

Yes… and someone to their liking has the possibility to be a more stable, longer lasting relationship. Plus, they’ll come with a stronger support network.

So if you think of a marriage as being to promote stability and perpetuate humanity, arranged marriages make sense. If you think of a marriage as something based solely on romance, the experts are obviously the people getting married.

Personally, what I’ve seen in western society is that people tend to live common law, and when a couple feels like they’re fairly stable together and they want to have children, then they get married.

This obviously doesn’t work in a society where you don’t get to try out living with someone first, or where birth control is frowned upon.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

theyll choose someone to their liking over yours, no?

Did you just say "All parents are evil"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iceonfire1@feddit.nl 20 points 3 weeks ago

For some of my friends in the US, finding a nice person to date is difficult. An arranged marriage means 1.) they are recommended to a suitor and more likely to be taken seriously, 2) the suitor is recommended to them, so they are less likely to be a waste of time, and 3) someone else is also at least a little invested in the relationship. Given the above, and that the actual people involved still have to consent for the relationship to progress, an arranged marriage actually makes a lot of sense.

It's kind of like a dating app (which also recommends a match), but if the algorithm was human and actually worked to your benefit instead of to make money.

[-] JewishLeftist@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Doesnt sound such a bad way to find a man honestly

Sheesh. There's a lot of weird ideas in this thread.

I made a lot of mistakes in my teens and 20s, including but not limited to my poor choices in romantic partners.

If it was culturally appropriate, it would've been great to have some help.

[-] meekah@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

I think there's still a big difference between getting help when dating and getting an arranged marriage

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
104 points (91.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

33831 readers
974 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS