439
submitted 4 months ago by disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

WASHINGTON (AP) — The federal judge in Florida presiding over the classified documents prosecution of former President Donald Trump has canceled the May 20 trial date, postponing it indefinitely.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 245 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It must be nice to live in a world where you appoint your own judge. It’s time for Smith to take action. A judge can be removed in “any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” This is not impartiality.

https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-28-judiciary-and-judicial-procedure/part-i-organization-of-courts/chapter-21-general-provisions-applicable-to-courts-and-judges/section-455-disqualification-of-justice-judge-or-magistrate-judge

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 66 points 4 months ago

Smith has been working on getting this crazy Judge removed for a while…

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago

He hasn’t filed anything yet. She was way off base asking for jury instructions so early. Not to mention the PRA pre-trial defense was struck down without prejudice, meaning the defense may use it in the trial. Removing the trial from the calendar entirely is the icing on the cake.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 51 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He certainly has and has a history of doing so.

He hates her for all the right reasons, and is doing anything he can to get her removed from the case.

Edit: tbf, so is she

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He has absolutely pushed back on her requests and challenged her decisions. He hasn’t done anything to get her removed yet. That would be filing a motion for recusal based on lack of impartiality.

[-] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 28 points 4 months ago

From what I've heard he only gets one shot at a motion for recusal, so he's waiting until there's no chance the recusal will be denied.

Or so I hope

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This ruling from her may have been the last straw he was waiting for before he files the motion for her to recuse.

He gets one shot at this, and he better not miss. That’s why he’s waiting until he has the absolute best chance he can have.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 59 points 4 months ago

At this point she should be considered an accessory to his crimes.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 26 points 4 months ago

The judges impartiality is in question. The judge is demonstrating partiality to one side of the case.

Impartiality would imply that she's not partial to one side or the other when she's clearly favoring the defendant.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

That is correct. I corrected my error.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 110 points 4 months ago
[-] Bipta@kbin.social 30 points 4 months ago

He chose the judge for where he moved to commit the crimes... We shouldn't expect anything less.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 106 points 4 months ago

If she doesn't get removed, next Republican president will make her a Supreme Court Justice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 86 points 4 months ago

Cannon was appointed by Trump and people are surprised that this happened

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 49 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

While that may explain a lack of impartiality, it doesn’t justify it. She’s held to the same standard as any other judge. All the more reason Smith should file a motion for recusal.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

Just because something is supposed to happen does not mean that it will. By all rights Trump should have been kicked out of office and be sitting in jail right now but he isnt. Just like Nixon and a whole cadre of others that slithered away without facing any real consequences.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Just because things that should have happened and didn't, doesn't mean this time it won't. This judge may face repercussions. It may not be any that impact the trump case though

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Id love to be wrong here but Trump has been impeached twice (which did jack shit because the republicans in the senate would have had to help convict him) and the only real consequences for what hes done were in civil trials and even that was monetary. They didnt even make him pay the bail bond he was initially "required" to pay. He's been threatened with consequences for contempt of court over a dozen times now.

Unfortunately the best predictor of the future is the past and the past hasnt laid a hand on him.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] exanime@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

She’s held to the same standard as any other judge.

which seems to be no standard at all...

All the more reason Smith should file a motion for recusal.

yet he inexplicably does not... hmm I wonder

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Who is surprised by this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 65 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This is evidence # 37586682 that all MAGA folks are Russian assets, doing their job to destroy the US from within. Because its textbook ruling as in Russia.

Forget about the hush money, this was far more a priority as it is related to national security. Now the thugs of this world know they have carte blanche with trump. This treasonous PoS should rot in a cell for this.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 30 points 4 months ago

I totally agree with the importance of this case. It’s the most concerning in my opinion. There is testimony that Trump divulged classified information to Russian intelligence, as well as having sold classified submarine schematics. This case needs to be heard prior to the election, as it’s directly relevant to charging him with access to this information for a second term.

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 42 points 4 months ago

So Americans... at what point do you finally realize you have a two tier legal system and actually act on it?

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Our legal system has 4 tiers of justice. If you are poor, a person of color or of another lowly respected group, you are too many times presumed guilty.

If you are working class to middle class, and can afford a decent lawyer, you get a middling level of justice. The better that you are able to differentiate yourself from the poor, and appear to look innocent, the better your outcome.

When you enter actual wealth, you can afford to put off trials, get counsel that can enact intensive clogging of the justice system. Prosecutors will be using inordinate resources to try a case and will plea bargain to ridiculous levels to be able to function for the rest of their duties. There is some justice in that what is spent on lawyers will meet or exceed the fines that they may have received otherwise.

The highest tier can always take their money elsewhere. They can purchase citizenship to other countries, including those without extradition, and are nations to themselves. The last two levels are either somewhat above the law, or completely exempt from the rule of law.

What is new is that members of a political party are seen as exempt from law, and that a ruler is exempt from law for life.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago

It’s by the design of capitalism. If you have more money, you can afford better attorneys and appeals. Trump is bringing the invisible third-tier to light with this case, having appointed the judge in 2020 that’s now presiding over his case.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago

"Judge appointed by Trump cancels trial date for Trump's classified documents case".

AP news needs to start fucking calling it how it really is.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

Can her and get a real judge

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Corrupt Cunt

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 months ago

I don't understand why we would want to prosecute crimes. /s

This judge is a hero! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
439 points (97.6% liked)

News

22956 readers
3701 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS