274
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago
[-] MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Looks like stack overflow privileges

[-] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

On stackoverflow, even asking questions is a privilege.

You won't get banned for being toxic, but you will if your question isn't a "proper" one.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

“comp” seems to refer to compensation.

[-] colorado@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

It makes so much more sense. I thought when hotels say comped they meant make something complimentary/free but compensation makes more sense.

[-] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I could see it being used interchangeably tbh

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago

Would you prefer SO to be paid?

[-] UlrikHD@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

That would never be an option for Stackoverflow

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

Well guy complains about compensation for his "work". I assume he's ready to shell out a few dollars for when he'll need it :-)

[-] UlrikHD@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago

His "work" as you put it, is the only thing of value on the site. SO without users to provide answers are worth zero dollars, so I'm not sure why you put work in quotation mark.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because if he's able to help anyone on SO, he very likely profited many, many times from free access to knowledge there before he got to this point. Given activity of average user he probably gained orders of magnitude more than he given.

I find rambling about money and compensation in such context distasteful.

SO provided platform which, while not perfect is used by millions of people. They aren't overloaded with ads and dark patterns as many of the clones. If it's worthless, why people are using it instead self hosted blogs for example?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

the owners of SO make far more than the benefit provided to any single dev. if that were not true, they wouldn't be in business.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if that were not true, they wouldn't be in business.

Why? They are not loosing anything while developers are gaining time using their website.

They had 66 million dollars revenue in 2021. They have about 20 million registered users (and much more unregistered, and that's revenue not income, but let's forget that). Do you really, honestly feel, that SO doesn't save you $3 worth of time per year?

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I use stackoverflow for minutes at a time and it almost never has answers to the questions I need answers to. if it has an answer, it's usually "you can't do that". reference docs are 100% of the time more helpful. so no, I don't think so.

[-] DzikiMarian@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Why do you go there then? If you don't, they won't get their $3 out of you and universe is in balance again :-)

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

frustration, usually, hoping against hope that the answer is relevant.

[-] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You guys are funny. If you don't want to see ads, use adblock. Now SO is a free platform for people that want to contribute.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

I don't want Google to have my info. the ads are secondary.

[-] andyli@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

At least you're not rewarded with more ads.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

With the way SO treats their mods, I'm very much looking forwards to an alternative pick up

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
274 points (95.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19166 readers
1433 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS