this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
107 points (99.1% liked)

News

36912 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

General Motors’ Cruise autonomous vehicle unit has agreed to cut its fleet of San Francisco robotaxis in half as authorities investigate two recent crashes in the city.

The state Department of Motor Vehicles asked for the reduction after a Cruise vehicle without a human driver collided with an unspecified emergency vehicle on Thursday.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Cutting them in half is certainly one way to keep them from driving.

[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't wait for them to cut the human fleet in half once they see how many crashes people cause!

[–] sky@codesink.io 2 points 2 years ago

Damn if only there were a way to get around in San Francisco that wasn't driving or being driven!

[–] ZagamTheVile@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, how many other car crashes happened in the same time frame?

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

These crashes are all by the same "driver". If one person crashed two cars in a day, don't you think they should stop driving for a bit?

[–] Hubi@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hm, that's actually a pretty good analogy. I haven't thought of it that way before.

[–] stigmata@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

No it's not. If that one person crashed twice after 500 trips and everyone else is crashing once after 200 trips, I'm still taking the person whose average crashes is more than two times less often.

[–] stigmata@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not if they did significantly more trips than the chances of a normal person crashing twice.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know how many trips these cars drive per day? Please enlighten us. If you don't have any sources, stop making things up with no evidence.

[–] stigmata@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I mean, that argument could work both ways right?

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

How is that in any way comparable?

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don’t think we or they (autonomous vehicles.) are ready for it…

[–] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago

The only way they ever will be is with lots and lots of training.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago

They are more ready than human drivers.