this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
291 points (96.8% liked)

News

37008 readers
2153 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What in the name of all the Earth and its domains and the heavens above is this asshattery?

The family of Ruth Bader Ginsburg is very much up in arms at something called the Dwight D. Opperman Foundation over its decision to give a leadership award named after the former Supreme Court justice to **drumroll* … *Elon Musk.

. . . Oh yeah, Rupert Murdoch is also getting this year’s Leadership Award, along with Martha Stewart (weird but whatever), Michael Milken (what?), and Sylvester Stallone (no, seriously, fucking what?).

. . . The award is all of four years old, and has previously gone to “individual women of prominence.” Did we run out of those or something?

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 112 points 2 years ago (3 children)

These fucking Parks and Rec prophecies

[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Everything I do is the attitude of an award winner, because I've won an award.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Dorothy Everton-Smyth woman of the year?!?

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Dorothy Everytime Smurf Girl Trophy for Excellence in Female Stuff

please

[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago
[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)

In Australia, one of our previous PMs appointed himself Minister for Women.

He also claimed his greatest achievement for women was repealing a carbon tax as it helped women better budget the family income.

[–] Instigate@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He also chomped into a whole raw onion on live tv.

Man, the Abbott days were pretty funny when following political commentary.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago

Funny but dangerous. I'm glad the christo-fash shit didn't take off and he just looked like an idiot.

[–] Gorbash@lemmy.today 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Minister for woman. He also pointed out women bore the cost of rising energy prices because they did the ironing.

[–] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Gorbash@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago

When he assumed the position the sign for his assistant Minister, Michaela Cash, was misprinted :

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/office-plaque-typo-leaves-coalition-red-faced/xu2p6emth

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 67 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A press release from the foundation says Musk is being recognized for entrepreneurship,

Lol what? When I think of an entrepreneur, I think of a person who rose from nothing on their work and got to the top.

Elon was born into money and handed money to get even richer

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He also both is and has a dick.

[–] MrFappy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure that the jury is still out on that second one.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

is a dick, at least

And not very good at it, if twitter and Tesla are any indication. Both products quality take a nosedive any time he involves himself

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 62 points 2 years ago

You probably are also wondering the same thing we were — well, one of several things — which is how in the hell Sylvester Stallone got on this list. Is the next Rambo movie going to nod to modernity by rebooting the franchise with a bloodthirsty female Green Beret? Does he have a heretofore-unknown-to-us reputation as being a feminist filmmaker?

But last year’s 12-member award committee included Stewart as well as Jennifer Flavin Stallone, Sylvester’s wife.

Ah. Well then.

So this award is a joke now.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

"The monkeys make trophies and then give them to each other... like they mean something." - Ernest Cline

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

This is truly the dumbest timeline

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hang on, is it actually called the "Women of Distinction" award? The article body calls it the “Ruth Bader Ginsburg Leadership Award”, which doesn't sound gender-specific. If there's nothing about the award that requires it specifically to be given to women, other than just being named after a woman and being given to one the first few times, what's the problem?

The article is laden with snarky comments and obviously biased opinions, and the article it links to as its source is paywalled, so it's not really clear what's going on here.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From the press release:

Established in 2020, the RBG Award has previously recognized women of distinction, including HM Queen Elizabeth II and Barbra Streisand. The award was expanded this year to include trailblazing men and women. "Justice Ginsburg fought not only for women but for everyone," said Julie Opperman, Chair of the Dwight D. Opperman Foundation. "Going forward, to embrace the fullness of Justice Ginsburg's legacy, we honor both women and men who have changed the world by doing what they do best."

[–] ech@lemm.ee 62 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“Going forward, to embrace the fullness of Justice Ginsburg’s legacy, we honor both women and men who have changed the world by doing what they do best.”

Ah, that must be why 80% of the recipients this year were men. What a joke. And musk & murdoch being awarded is an absolute insult.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It did alert me to this award existing.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

"Speed run to awareness, any %."

And now they're worthless. Better less awareness but with integrity than a shitshow and a laughing stock.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

/c/NotTheOnion

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

Did they stumble upon the Space Karen picture and thought what an upstanding woman!

[–] nifty@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If RGB was alive she would not give this award to Murdoch or Musk, but I don’t know about Stallone

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

He did some porn work in the ‘80s. So brave? 🤷🏽‍♂️

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 years ago

Stallone crossed the picket line during the SAG-AFTRA strike. So, I'd say that it's pretty clear why these three were selected.

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Why don't they give the award to Amy Coney Barrett?

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

An obvious and boring attempt at attention seeking.