Mnemnosyne

joined 2 years ago
[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While a lot of the time the applications of a technology precede it's discovery, it's certainly not ultra rare for the discovery to prompt the applications, because nobody ever gave much thought to 'what can we do with X'.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Different systems have different methods of doing surprise, but the implication here is you roll to see if you are surprised, and success means you are not surprised.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I like he crew quarters being in the path of the methane flow. Makes thing efficient to route the methane through the crew quarters.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Where I live, there's switches next to the front and back door.

I've been here since 2017.

I still flip the ones closest to the doors to turn on the porch light because that's what makes sense, instead of the one further from the door that actually does it.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, people shouldn't be allowed to be involved with things that they don't care about enough to know all that came before. Whether it's a movie, a book, a game, a tv series, it should always be done by people who genuinely care and are fans of it.

The difference is like night and day when everyone cares. The Lord of the Rings is probably one of the best examples. The vast majority of people on that knew the source material well, and that let them work towards the same vision, each contributing in their own way. The things that were changed were never because nobody gave a shit. I don't agree with all of them, but I can't say they did them without consideration.

When everyone cares, that's when something amazing is made.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Well, I think games that have the greatest possibility between them make the best choices. So...

Stellaris. - I want a 4x and grand strategy and this one is a bit of both. Also considering how much it's changed since 1.0, the various versions of it provide a lot of variety in themselves. Also it's got great mod support. Its core systems have also been rebuilt a couple times, so I know it has a good deal of potential and isn't locked too hard into certain mechanics.

Conan Exiles. - This is a really weird choice cause the game isn't amazing in and of itself, or even all that good, and it's pretty buggy, but it's one of the most customizable, mod supported multiplayer games I know of. Maybe there's a better choice and if I had time to research it I'd pick that one. I know there's a multiplayer mod for Skyrim, for example, but I'm not technical enough to know if that has better possibilities than Conan. Hell, maybe Minecraft has potential here? I have never liked it much. It would be absolutely necessary to me that it can be updated to decent (not blocky) graphics though.

Elite: Dangerous. - This is another choice I'd like to research a better option for. The thing is I want a flight/space game, but I don't know enough about the genre, and this is the only one that immediately comes to mind. Its kind of my one mostly unselfish pick cause I haven't played this type of game in a long time.

Baldur's Gate 3. - It's not actually my favorite rpg or even my favorite Baldur's Gate, but Larian designed it with good mod support and tools. Also it can support multiplayer very easily. Like the others on this list, it's here for future adaptability; if we're never getting new games, mods of these 5 have to be as much like new games as possible.

An MMO. - This is the toughest one to answer myself cause I don't know enough about the back end of them. The trick is choosing the one with the most broadly applicable technical side. I want as much possibility in future development as I can get, and I'd really like one that isn't inextricably linked to the target based gameplay we currently know from most of them. If required to pick without research, I would reluctantly choose Guild Wars 2, cause it at least isn't tied to tab targeting, but I have no idea if it's good with my other criteria.

Now, you'll notice I didn't pick any games without multiplayer, and that's cause if these are going to be the only 5 games left until the end of time they should all support multiplayer. No single player only need apply.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Got a pauldron protecting the shoulder, gorget protecting the neck, helmet protecting head and ear. There's no possible harm that might come to you holding the sword that way.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Epstein files are the only thing that's maintained even a tiny bit of traction among his supporters and made some of them...well I'd say think twice, but that implies thinking a first time.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

A filtered group that is selected to be favorable toward the representative, not hostile to him.

If they can't even get their filtered group to overwhelmingly support their positions, it seems unlikely that a general sampling of the population would.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

To give the current owners the chance to do the right thing, and make a small but reasonable gain from their property.

And to make it more palatable to the general public. It's a lot easier to convince people to go along with it if you're seizing empty unused properties that are only empty and unused because the owner refuses to rent them if they're not making excessive profit.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

Problem easily solved. Is a building not being utilized? Seize it and pay the owner fair market value, then have the city administrate it and charge just enough rent to cover expenses of maintenance and improvement and administration.

[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are objectively good games. There are not objectively fun games.

Half-Life 2 is objectively good, and if you say it's a bad game you're simply wrong. However if you say it's a game you do not enjoy and isn't fun for you, that's not wrong.

A game can be both good and not enjoyable to you.

Conversely, a game can also be objectively bad and yet fun for some people.

view more: next ›