.

And the thumbnail is a picture of a nuclear plant......

what percentage of all jobs/economic growth is that 10% responsible for (including downstream supply chains)?

And I'll wager my left eye there'll still be western capitalist-sympathizers(because they themselves are not capitalists, as they own no capital nor any means of production, mass or otherwise) having themselves a jolly old wankfest about how we shouldn't be having a good long think about the Robespierre method

Every time I see such evaluations I get this picture of an economically illiterate person just making assumptions from some statistics they are unable to comprehend. A bit like with electrical engineering.

And in any case the useful metric would be pollution per dollar (or per joule) spent by a person, not totals. I don't think I have to explain why, it's obvious.

Wait, how is that possible when China is responsible for 50% of the carbon emissions? This doesn’t add up.

Sounds like a conservative nummber