OurToothbrush

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I think just saying he killed his girlfriend isn't taken as "political" but I think killing your girlfriend and killing your girlfriend because she cheated are both actions with a political content

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I'd just remove all detail of what she did, no matter how you phrase it it reads as potential justification. Those details don't matter.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago

Sounds good

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you're getting hung up on an artificial separation of politics and economics, you should look up a critique of this or investigate why political economy is a useful framework for analysis.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Where is that video of the Chinese cop tearing milk company managers a new one for calling the police in response to workers staging a sit in as part of a labor dispute?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Bisexuals who bring the straight relationship paradigm into dating or the bedroom. (Not all or most bisexuals, but damn, certainly some)

It's mostly just really sad -men need to up their dating game, and a lot of straight sex expectations feel kinda rapey. Like girl it's not normal for your partner to choke you in the middle of sex without asking or prenegotiation and it is weird that you were disappointed that I didn't do that.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

there is no way Biden or Harris would have approved the 20 point genocidal plan in the article.

Biden straight up gave arms and support to Israel over his tenure, including after October 7th when the genocide intensified. Biden also supported the genocide.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 14 points 4 months ago

https://www.google.com/search?q=italy+operation+gladio

There are a few academic publications on this in the first page of Google search results

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I’m assuming there was a large violent massacre

Holy shit people just say things

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 months ago

A munch is just a social. People chat and stuff, kinky things don't happen, and it is generally discouraged to use the space for cruising. Different munch dress codes vary from "be very normycore inconspicuous" to "be decent"

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Ah, a YouTuber named "habitual linecrosser". Perhaps the "source: it came to me in a dream" commenter was too generous.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Are you claiming you know this from classified information?

 

Hello! I can feel a new hyperfixation coming on, does anyone have any recommendations for books about ww2 written by Marxists, preferably MLs?

 

Press Statement by Spokesman for DPRK Ministry of National Defence Pyongyang, December 2 (KCNA) -- A spokesman for the Ministry of National Defence of the DPRK released the following press statement "Any attack on space asset of the DPRK will be deemed declaration of war against it" on Saturday:

The brigandish nature of the U.S., which regards it as its main lever for realizing its hegemonic wild ambition to commit outrageous and unlawful military intervention against sovereign countries, has been brought to light more clearly, occasioned by the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite launch.

An official concerned of the U.S. Space Command recently spouted rubbish hinting at a military attack on the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite, saying that the U.S. can decrease the enemy country's outer space operation capabilities by employing diverse "reversible and irreversible methods".

American military affairs experts comment that the U.S. Space Force can physically destroy not only opponent's satellite and satellite earth station but also get rid of enemy state's space force through jamming and virus-using cyber attack.

The U.S. Space Force's deplorable hostility toward the DPRK's reconnaissance satellite can never be overlooked as it is just a challenge to the sovereignty of the DPRK, and more exactly, a declaration war against it.

Article 8 of the "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies", the main international outer space treaty, stipulates that any object launched into outer space definitely falls under the jurisdiction of the launcher state and the ownership of it never changes no matter it remains in outer space or returned to the earth.

This means that the reconnaissance satellite "Malligyong-1" is a part of the territory of the DPRK where its sovereignty is exercised.

Furthermore, reconnaissance satellite is not regarded as a space weapon by international law for its technical features aimed at observation.

If the reconnaissance satellite of the DPRK is regarded by the U.S. as a "military threat" that must be gotten rid of, countless spy satellites of the U.S. flying above the Korean peninsula region every day, exclusively tasked with monitoring the major strategic spots of the DPRK, should be deemed the primary targets to be destroyed by the armed forces of the DPRK.

By openly unveiling its aggression scheme to mount a military attack on a space asset of other sovereign country, a part of its properties and territory, the U.S. has proved itself its true colors as the chief culprit of evils seeking to realize its wild ambition for dominating the world by turning outer space, common wealth of humankind, into a theater of war.

It is the mission of the armed forces of the DPRK, specified by its constitution and other laws, to exercise their war deterrent to protect the state sovereignty and territorial integrity in case a lethal military attack is carried out against the country's strategic assets or it is judged that such attack is imminent.

In case the U.S. tries to violate the legitimate territory of a sovereign state by weaponizing the latest technologies illegally and unjustly, the DPRK will consider taking responsive action measures for self-defence to undermine or destroy the viability of the U.S. spy satellites by exercising its legitimate rights vested by international and domestic laws. -0- www.kcna.kp (Juche112.12.2.)

 
 

Some U.S. officials are frustrated at the pace of Ukraine’s counteroffensive, which has gained less than 100 square miles of territory.

view more: next ›