372
So this woman is randomly making up shit about little girls getting repeatedly raped in response to the State of the Union address. Disgusting.
Well, it's not random. They want to blame Biden for problems at the border by telling the true story of an abuse victim from 20 years ago who never crossed the border.
how could biden let this happen
Specifically during the Bush administration. How could he?
"It's because he was too old, even more so 20 years ago." - certain news media, probably
THANKS OBAMA
while ignoring the border bill that would address EVERYTHING THEY WANTED. Amazing.
Worse still, she is doing it to help an admitted sexual abuser* and adjudged rapist** elected to the highest office in the land.
* Grab them by the pussy" tape.
** E. Jean Carroll civil trial.
It's very on-brand for the GQP.
This guy does a really good investigation into it and brings receipts. (I know it’s on the Artist Formally Known As Twitter, but if you’re interested, it’s a good watch.)
https://x.com/yashar/status/1766329114292842930?s=46&t=yjuyDDOnc1cePh0ZQ-H2MA
Copy it over here for those of us that would prefer not to visit that cesspool.
Unfortunately it's a Twitter video, and the only way to download it is with a premium subscription. And that is NOT happening. Hard stop.
the only way to download it is with a premium subscription
This doesn't help you on a mobile device, but in case others weren't aware of its existence, there's a great open source tool for downloading from many/most websites: yt-dlp
It's a video link, but basically, he ran down the visit to Texas she talked about, found out the other politicians who went with her, then found out who they met with.
And for those of us who can't visit the cesspool.
Well, if the poor woman who suffered the horrible abuse starting at the age of 12, it had to have been at least 6 years ago (assuming she is an 18 y/o adult now). This places it under Trump or earlier in any event.
If this bitch was blonde she'd be working at Fox News instead of for the heritage foundation.
Calling her a bitch is an insult to female dogs.
Like any of them are real blondes...
Thanks, hadn't seen the Pinocchio unit of measure before but she apparently earned 🤥🤥🤥🤥.
Watered down headline. "Trump supporters" say dumb stuff all the time. She is a US Senator
I watched around 60% of the neural missfires contorting into words spewing out of her facehole.
Her vibe alternates between:
-
condescending mom scolding her children for asking what gay means or why god tolerates evil in the world if she were real
-
"please dont hit me again, I was wrong as always in questioning you my sweet loving husband"
-
You should all be afraid because the West is falling, again, for real this time, pinky promise, I swear on my dead mothers grave
Queue the pavlovian response from the average republican voter, like a dead frog poked with an electric prod.
Idk nj.com, how about you just fucking tell me in the headline to not sound like a weasel.
Fun rule of journalism, 'Betteridge's Law' : if a headline asks a question, the answer is almost always 'no'.
Edit: lmao even the writer mentions in the first line. I mean why even try to argue your point after that?
Because even though the event itself was not a lie, attempting to frame it as negative to the Biden administration was? 🤔
Probably and most likely nothing will come of it.
this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
372 points (97.7% liked)
politics
19090 readers
2060 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS