Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Non-filers making between $400,000 and more than $1 million with unfiled federal returns from tax years 2017 to 2021 will receive the initial round of letters
Blows my mind that people earning that much aren't filing their taxes. It's hard to imagine that they're oblivious to the requirement, so they're just blatant cheaters?
I was audited for $35.
Were you "audited" or actually audited? So many people say they were "audited" when they actually just received a letter asking them to support what they claimed. An actual audit is a full review of absolutely everything to re-build up your returns from scratch and verify every little detail. Even for basic returns audits often take multiple days to complete.
I paid my taxes with bill pay, they cashed the checks, but didn't apply them to the tax year because apparently they need to know the year to apply it to.
That's crazy.
What?! How'd that turn out?
They not necessarily not paying taxes, just not filing.
The agency urges recipients to take “immediate action” to avoid more letters, higher penalties and “stronger enforcement measures.”
I'm glad they added those two last ones, but why more letters at all? "Stop or we'll tell you to stop again" isn't much of of a threat.
The US government lives on paperwork. One of the most important things one can do in the government is generate paperwork to prove you have generated paperwork. It seems like a hopelessly pointless exercise, until said paperwork is used to bury someone in court. It removes any doubt that the target of the action was aware of their obligations and the possible results of failing those obligations.
I hear you, but I think this might be a step up: It sounds like... they never event sent notices to wealthy non-filers in the past! (If I've misunderstood, please correct me. I'm embarrassed to admit I did not read the original article.)
And seeing as they're sending notices now, perhaps this means they'll follow through with making sure this gets done. One can hope...
I understand that we don't have a debtors prison in the USA, and that's a good thing, because it would be unfairly used against the poorest.
Meanwhile, we've got to stop pretending people like this can and should be tried for failure to pay their taxes. It's not like with poor people, where they simply don't have the money to pay it, these people clearly have the money and have no intent to pay it. At that point we should be raising it to the crime of tax dodging and start actually fucking arresting people and dispensing with this pussy-ass strongly worded letter shit.
If nothing else, it pretty well cuts off any claims they might make about not being aware they were not in compliance. It speeds cases along once they do get to court, plus there's the prospect of fines, so on.
The new wave of letters comes amid IRS plans to reverse “historically low audit rates” of large corporations, complex partnerships and higher earners.
Fruit from the GOPs kneecapping of the IRS.
And if you don't think about what you did we'll send you another letter, even more strongly worded.
$400,00 and not filing? Assholes. Get'em Joe!
“Nah, we’ll just wait for Trump to get into office. The Supreme Court has given us the green light.”🚦
Can we start with people of the orange persuasion and their minions?