"We'd really like to set the precedent now that a larger neighboring country should be able to invade the Taiwan without any military support from outside that might impede this. What? Did I say Taiwan? I mean, 'a smaller country'" - China probably

This is what anti NATO sentiment gets you. It‘s not like China just started supporting Russia‘s invasion. They‘ve been working together from the very start and quite openly. But after Trump‘s rambling they now feel confident enough to show it plainly at a UN meeting.

I mean just late last year, Xi met with Biden in a historic visit, promising more cooperation and it took Trump a couple of minutes to reverse these efforts. Not like Xi could‘ve been trusted, but there was at least hope he could somewhat be contained, China being highly dependent on global relations and all. That‘s off the table now. Looks like we got another crazy dictator on the loose now.

This might be the most evil thing China has done in a while. I mean this suggestion doesn't include a demand that Russia also stops sending weapons to Ukraine, right?

A lot of mental gymnastics going on there, I hope they don’t pull a brain tendon.

This is one of the most brain dead takes China has had, and they’ve had a lot.

As other have said here, this is obviously an attempt to create a foundation of legitimacy for their own invasion of Taiwan. What I don’t understand about diplomacy at this level is this: Why do they care? What I mean is, everyone in this deliberating body knows what they are doing, and everyone observing it knows as well. Furthermore, as a permanent, veto holding, member of the Security Council, China faces no actual oversight from the UN as a whole. So, why bother with the show?

Fuck you, China, and fuck you, Russia.

I don't have a good feeling about the future. China seems to side a lot with Russia at the UN lately.

So Trump agrees with ChyNA. Why is Trump pushing China’s agenda?

why not just ask for Iran and north Korea to give them weapons they could never be against that.

This is the best summary I could come up with:

China's ambassador to the United Nations, Zhang Jun, has said the U.S. should stop sending weapons to Ukraine to allow diplomatic efforts to work.

China hasn't officially extended support to Russia's war in Ukraine, but Beijing has provided financial assistance, allowing the Kremlin to build weapons and fund the conflict.

"NATO must adhere to dialogue and consultation in resolving disputes and to the general direction of political settlement, instead of engaging in pressure, smearing and unilateral sanctions, and even less in the use of force.

The Senate members voted 70-29, paving the way for the House of Representatives to review the $60.06 billion in additional aid to Ukraine, CNN reported on Tuesday.

"Without Western military aid, the odds of Ukraine successfully resuming large-scale offensive operations to liberate its Russian-occupied territories in 2025 are at the outer end of the optimistic range.

That in turn calls for a different long-term strategy for Ukraine and for its allies and partners," wrote Eugene Rumer, Director of the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, on February 7.

The original article contains 487 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!