210
An ex-president is encouraging attacks on allies by a major enemy. It's as simple as that. Once again, Trump proves he is a threat to the US. He's literally a security risk.
Truly the definition of security risk.
He's permanently damaged NATO. Even if he doesn't win, the damage is already done.
I disagree. NATO can rebound from this with the right U.S. president making the right concessions. But the will has to be there.
Alliances rely on trust.
NATO allies now know that vast swathes of the American electorate are willing to knowingly vote for probable Russian or Chinese assets, who won't have their back. If not in the next election, possibly in an election with the next few decades.
This has already been factored in. For example, given the timing, I doubt it's entirely a coincidence that the Japanese withdrew from their partnership with Lockheed Martin in favour of cooperation with BAE for a 6th generation fighter. Talk of (and funding for) EU strategic autonomy also increased dramatically after Trump's election. And I know plenty in the US like to complain about the EU not pulling its weight, historically not without reason, but in the longterm the Europeans moving further from the US won't result in more weapons sales for the US. Likely the opposite: Europe first.
When it comes to intelligence sharing, the US electing a Russian asset who shared classified documents with the Russians and likely got foreign assets killed, really isn't something that you can fix in a few years either. The damage is lasting if not permanent. Trump may be gone, but US institutions are still filled with his supporters and ideological fellow travellers.
Especially at a time when China is ascendent, it's possible that Trump has permanently fucked the US and that the zenith of US power and influence has already passed. That it is all downhill from here. Behold the decline and fall, let's all hold hands with our backs to the wall.
No, not in a few years. I'm just saying it's not necessarily permanent.
And half of the country still wants to vote for this insurrectionist clown.
The reason is very simple. Conservatives are vile pieces of shit. It really is that easy.
Nearly every act of bigotry ever committed in history has been done by conservatives. Nearly every war of aggression, every genocide and every oppressive dictatorship throughout history has been at the hands of conservatives. In fact, nothing good in all of human history has ever come from conservatism. Nothing at all.
Vile pieces of shit will always vote for the most vile piece of shit they can find. They can't help themselves because they are vile pieces of shit.
An insurrectionist clown encouraging a former KGB agent in charge of Russia to attack Europe.
Every dead Republican president since Eisenhower is spinning in his grave.
Eisenhower epiphet (colored)
I thought he was mask off in his previous campaign, but he definitely isn't holding back this time. He's telling his whole supporter base he'd happily do whatever Putin wanted and they cheer for him anyway... If they want to be Russian puppets so badly, we should just send them all off to Russia where they'd clearly be happier.
Reminds me of the guy with a shirt on at one of his rallies that read "rather be a Russian than a Democrat". I think the guy later tried to walk back the seriousness of his shirt, but these fools look like they're roped in whether they like it or not.
This man has been going off the deep end recently or I had recovered from seeing the wild shit that happened during his presidency.
He needs to keep going further in order to distract from what he has done in the past
This guy is absurd
He would fit in a 90s video game cutscene like Red Alert.
Honestly , no idea how his followers sleep at night, or are they just that stupid...?
Many are that stupid, compounded with a belief system that discourages critical thinking, encourages blind faith and trust, and maintains an insular culture through a hefty persecution complex.
Yes. I’m speaking about evangelical Christian’s.
America under Trump means our allyship erodes and we lose the power to stand up to major threats in the event of war, plain and simple
Traitors gonna betray.
I honestly can't understand how the party of Reagan became the party of traitors and insurrectionist.
Yes, how did the party of Iran-Contra suddenly start behaving underhandedly?
Then you don't actually know anything about Reagan or his party.
It's a possibility.
I'm really worried he'd straight up help Russia tbh. Why wouldn't he?
He'd sell Alaska if he could. Putin might even want it.
Won't be shocked if he tries. He's gotten away with lots of things he couldn't do, and if he's reelected the line is gonna get even blurrier. I don't know what could really happen and I'm not interested in finding out.
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
210 points (96.9% liked)
politics
18863 readers
3977 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS