225
submitted 10 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 98 points 10 months ago

Swift also bought more than double the amount of carbon credits needed to offset her private jet use for her Eras Tour, Paine told the Post on Monday.

What a joke.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 80 points 10 months ago

Yep. The problem is that 90% of offsets are fraudulent. So just buying more doesn't help

[-] Beefytootz@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

I feel like we need a Martin Luther for climate issues. You can't buy your way into heaven and you can't buy imaginary climate credits. Plant a fucking tree or fly commercial.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] scytale@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago

I hate how carbon credits are a thing. It's just throwing money at a problem so people turn a blind eye to what you're doing and not actually helping solve the problem.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Bullshit. Offsets are a serious market solution to climate change.

I'm actually starting a retail business for them. You can use Venmo, or Cash App, to purchase offsets for your day to day climate killing activities.

I'm even running a special. Normally it's $1 per mile driven, but today it's only $0.85/mile AND I'll throw in an offset for 5 pieces of petroleum based articles of clothing.

Once I've received payment, I'll send you a photo of the trees you just saved.

See? Totally legit. You don't have to thank me, just send me money. I'm happy to be doing my part!

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 9 points 10 months ago

If only 10% are real, then you just need to buy 1000% offsets!

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 13 points 10 months ago

Problem is that the more fraudulent offsets you buy, the more that get created to fill the demand for them. You can't buy your way out of this problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sadreality@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago

She paid some other rich dude so she doesn't need to explain her shiti behavior to brain dead fans.

Capitalism 101

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 89 points 10 months ago

Flight information is public. Sorry you don't like that, but suing this student won't change the availability of that information, and anyone could take their place in running a bot.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago

Maybe don't use a private jet then?
It would be a lot harder to track someone on a random flight in business class. And I can't imagine business class is more expensive than flying private.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 31 points 10 months ago

With random peasants? Are you crazy? But then again, swift fans seems super nuts, so i wouldn't wanna meet them as well

[-] mlfh@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago

It would be enormously easier to track Taylor Swift on a random flight in business class, because the moment people saw her on their random flight in business class it would turn into a social media frenzy.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

As a non American, I wouldn’t care actually. You guys need to chillax with your celebrity fetishisation

[-] whodatdair@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol, you think only Americans worship celebrities? You need to travel more lol - shit is an issue everywhere, you ever seen a k-pop idol?

Some humans just fall for that shit for whatever reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago

As an American, I can honestly say the only three times I've met a celebrity, once I didn't even recognize her (still don't remember her name, she had appearances on crime shows) , once I didn't care to acknowledge their presence (Kevin sorbo) , and once I literally just said "Hey do you and Alan Tudyk ever hang out since firefly? I love that show" to Nathan Fillion. Yes, they do things together sometimes.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 58 points 10 months ago

Now she will get to learn about the Streisand Effect firsthand.

[-] jadero@slrpnk.net 43 points 10 months ago

I came across this site a few years ago. Free to all with no login, they allow you to search for any call sign and show it on a map, complete with path from originating airport.

They have a free account allowing you to do even more (single plane) and 25 planes will cost you US$40/year. Android and iOS apps available.

They also have information on how to get or build the necessary equipment.

The most recent information I can get with a simple Google search shows that the call sign of one of her planes is N621MM, although other links suggested that she has more than one plane and has sold planes to escape this tracking.

Knock yourself out. Post it all over the damn place. Streisand effect FTW.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 42 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sweeney’s coverage, which uses publicly available data from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and broadcast signals from aircrafts...

Morrone added that there was “no legitimate interest in or public need for this information, other than to stalk, harass, and exert dominion and control”.

There's no need for public information from the FAA and broadcast signals from aircraft except domination and control?

This dude has to be a republican.

[-] LilNaib@slrpnk.net 40 points 10 months ago

She's rich enough to be able to easily afford ANY travel type possible, without having to even ask the cost, and she chooses the dirtiest and most expensive one.

If she cared about climate change, she would just intrinsically understand that paying someone else to be a good person doesn't morally justify her being a bad person (aka, how carbon credits are marketed and sold).

Instead of taking a trans-oceanic flight, she could go on a container ship or sailboat. She's a musician and I bet these experiences would be vastly more inspiring than harassing college kids through lawyers.

For domestic travel she could use a vehicle powered by restaurant waste vegetable oil (WVO) instead of fossil fuel. Or she could take an EV charged by renewable sources. Ewan McGregor and Charley Boorman did a 13000 mile (21000km) electric motorcycle trip in 2019 from the southern tip of Argentina to Los Angeles called The Long Way Up, their 3rd such superlong trip, and their first on electric vehicles. They loved it and called it the future, and they had support from a prototype Rivian truck, which therefore advanced the space of electric cars as well. MANY people are doing this, some rich, some poor. For our climate emissions, there's no time left for excuses either for Taylor Swift or for ourselves.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Swift: I've gained a lot of goodwill among people this last month, how can I ruin it and make myself look like an out of touch millionaire again?

[-] NOOBMASTER@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

Starting to get curious, what did she do that counts as goodwill?

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

Pissed off Maga and is helping young people to register and be politically active by voting. I liked that she was getting her fanbase involved so they would actually vote instead of just bitching. But now she's gonna and done this, reminding us she's nothing but an out of touch millionaire

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Taylor Swift threatens legal action against person posting the same public information the jet itself posts (ADSB). nothing illegal about this. come at me swifties.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 34 points 10 months ago

Can't have proof you're a major polluter

[-] philm@slrpnk.net 32 points 10 months ago

Haha, hasn't she learned about the outcome of the Streisand effect when Elon Musk tried to prevent it

(e.g. https://old.reddit.com/r/ElonJetTracker/)

I think all of this should be a motivation to track all kinds of private jets of billionaires, and make it as public/loud as possible...

[-] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 28 points 10 months ago

Transponders are, by necessity, public. What a ridiculous C&D.

[-] Fartmaster@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD can someone please explain to her what a train is

[-] sonori@beehaw.org 9 points 10 months ago

Not that i’m against trains, but to my knowledge there is still no railway that crosses Panama let alone the Atlantic and Pasific oceans.

[-] wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

The United States doesn't even have tracks across all of the land-connected states. South Dakota and Wyoming don't have Amtrak - if I'm not mistaken they have no public train services and you'd need a Greyhound bus.

Alaska and Hawaii too, although those are least understandable why given their location.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

She is a selfish cunt. Only a selfish cunt would fly a private jet every where they go.

I can’t imagine how large this ugly cunts CO2 footprint is.

Looks like this cunt is upset someone is calling her out on her selfish shitty behavior. I hope more people step up to track her so she gets even more upset.

We should be shaming cunts this like.

[-] primalanimist@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago

In this thread: People so upset about using the word cunt they are willing to ignore the actions of some celebrity contributing to the culture of excess that is harmful to our world, while at the same time making herself look like an uneducated child by tossing threats that have no bite. She's now Mini-Elon to me.

[-] MadBob@feddit.nl 7 points 10 months ago

That's the thing for me about this kind of ad hominem bollocks: the discussion invariably goes: "she's an ugly cunt" "no need for that" "why are you so offended" "you should focus on the point at hand rather than calling names" "people are so upset by a word that they lose focus of the point at hand", then the conversation just becomes about why we're not talking about the thing we were talking about.

Plus like, if someone's reading this who's worried about being ugly, they might feel a bit worse about themselves, and I don't think that's the kind of environment we want to cultivate. So, selfish cunt: certainly. Ugly cunt: bit far.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
225 points (93.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5383 readers
284 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS