158
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 114 points 5 months ago

I could look at the furthest star in the sky and it wouldn't be as out of touch as Nancy Pelosi

[-] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 42 points 5 months ago

And it would be less guilty of insider trading.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

What was her insider trade?

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Either she has an absolute savant of a portfolio manager or she is trading ahead of the headlines. In 2023 she was up >60%, most hedge funds had an ROI of 5-10%.

She is not the only member of Congress who is doing quite well in the market, on average they are up >35%.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

She also lost with -19% in 2022, worse than the S&P 500 at -18%

Her "Portfolio Manager" would be her Husband, who owns an investment firm. Literally all of her reported trades are due to the fact that she and her husband have joint ownership of finances by law.

But doing well is not an insider trade, and congressmen have served prison time for insider trading in the past, so I'm asking specifically what trade did she have information on ahead of the public? All of her trades are reported by law. You seemed so confident that she was insider trading, what was the trade?

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 97 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Ooph, these comments. Obviously this incredibly incompetent move from pelosi is going to hurt democrats.

According to the latest polling, half of all democrats and half of all 18-~~35~~ (edit: 18-29)year olds view this as a genocide. Of the other half, more are undecided than don't think it's a genocide.

You can't insult serious beliefs of half your base and think there won't be consequences.

Of course trump is a serious threat to democracy. Just like the last time I'm going to hold my nose and vote for biden. And just like last time, senior democrats are going to do everything in their power to shoot themselves in the foot.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 5 months ago

When aren't dems insulting their base?

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

When they're talking about rich white Boomers.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 months ago

If it weren’t actively and directly leading to the possible demise of democracy in America, it would be goddamn hilarious how good the Democratic leadership is at machine gunning their own foot.

[-] Sacha@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Yall need another party that actually matters in the race. Libertarians are crazy too and don't matter. And There's no 4th option.

I agree completely. But we’re not going to get one, because we have laws whose express intent is to make it nearly impossible for parties outside of the main two to have any real level of success.

[-] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

MSM: The wind blows, hurts Biden's 2024 Campaign

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 39 points 5 months ago

Except this wind is directly doing things to hurt Biden's campaign. A major establishment figure highlighting one of their biggest issues with their base and further antagonizing them is actually politically relevant.

[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

You don't think the things that the Dems say will effect whether people feel like voting for the Dems?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
158 points (81.9% liked)

politics

18080 readers
2930 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS