784
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 8 months ago

So all federal money cut off.

But wait, doesn't Texas pay more than they received?

Yes, but let's really look at this. Military and veterans don't get paid. Oil confiscated by the Navy stationed on both the East and West coast. Any company with a federal account closes down bc Texas doesn't pay the same. Massive border to protect against a reunification force.

I think they change their mind in a split second.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

biden should call the bluff and ask the house and senate to release texas from the union under the condition it compensates the US for any federal land and supplies.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

Can I apply for refugee status and move to a state not run by this sociopath?

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Cool, let’s pull back their federal funding and see how things go

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

Texas is a drag on our society. I say say cut em loose.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 24 points 8 months ago

Hypothetical from a non American. Let's say Texas DOES secede. What happens to the citizenship of the Americans in Texas? Do they lose it? Do they have to leave Texas in X days to keep it? Can it even be revoked? Should it?

If they kept it, would they need to still declare their taxes, as US citizens must pay tax on international income?

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They would become a territory, like Puerto Rico. They would still have citizenship and the benefits of citizenship, such as they would still have taxes. But would not vote in presidential elections, and their representatives would get no vote.

It is the best of all worlds. /$

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Saurok@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

I'm not like a US civil war scholar or anything, but there's at least a glimmer of precedence to be found there with what happened to average folk living in the Confederate States when those states seceded. Babies born in the Confederacy were considered US citizens because the US (the Union) never recognized the Confederacy as independent and legally considered it US territory still. As for adults, it was similar... The US treated them as if they had never lost US citizenship and either punished or pardoned people for treason and war related crimes after the war. So I guess the answer would depend on whether Texas wins or loses the inevitable war that the US would fight to keep Texas from seceding/declaring independence in the first place.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 months ago

This guy, these people, are so thick headed.

The court ruled that the border patrol officers have the constitutional authority to move some razor wire in some areas (this case mentions 2.5 miles) because it's in their way of apprehending people trying to get over the boarder - actually, people who have already set foot on US soil.

This is going to turn into some big thing because Abbot would rather let immigrants die in the river than permit border patrol to capture them.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

Again? Texas does this almost every election cycle and they aren't dumb enough to try it. Or maybe they are. That'd be a show.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] OrangeJoe@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

There's way too many people in here that either don't know the difference between succession and secession, or don't know how to spell, or just were too lazy to look at what they were typing or what was being autocorrected.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 22 points 8 months ago

Can the people of Texas recall their governor? Has to be a lot of them unhappy with this clown.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] eddanja@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Old guy who is only getting older wants to dictate so that he has some sort of legacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

I’m not suggesting that someone should disable the brakes on his wheelchair and then roll him into the street, but were he to be rolled into the street with no brakes, I wouldn’t be surprised.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 19 points 8 months ago

I want to say it'll never happen, but they may not be so good at paying attention to prevailing trends. If Texit happens I'll be watching with a big bowl of popcorn.

Willy Wonka: Stop. Don't. Come back.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 18 points 8 months ago

How's Trump's electoral math work out without Texas in the union?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Go for it, Abbott. Let's see your beloved Texas Rangers go up against satellite-guided drone bombers.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 17 points 8 months ago

Dog whistle to his supporters, that's all.

If they actually tried anything they'd be snuffed out pretty fast.

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Tx threatens secession every other day. why does he wear boots. js

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Do it. Go on.

[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 16 points 8 months ago

Please, try it. I dare you, Abbott.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

They know federal law supercedes state law, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Let them go and remove their risk from the power grid.

[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

I believe Texas has its own power grid. Also, still, let them go.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

I ducked into Texit Twitter yesterday and it's like an Alamo cosplay, an entirely fictional version of events is everywhere where there's somehow a 10th Amendment right to secede and Abbott is proving state supremecy by not complying with some deadline the federal government gave them to comply with the Supreme Court order. As if it was Iraq not abiding by Bush's demands and thus initiating war instead of the obvious actual situation where they are going to be sued again.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
784 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18933 readers
3269 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS