-24
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] maniacal_gaff@lemmy.world 49 points 8 months ago

Andrew Yang is not a serious person that people should listen to. Next.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Dean Phillips is still a thing? I legit thought that ended months ago.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

Guys never won an election.

[-] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Who?

….and that applies for both names mentioned.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Oh look, The Hill shilling for the right again.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -2 points 8 months ago

The candidate is a Democrat...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Hmm... can't imagine why Republicans might want to push a Democrat as an alternate candidate to Biden.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

It's a primary. We still live in a democracy, right?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Sorry... did anyone say it wasn't a primary or that we don't live in a democracy?

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world -5 points 8 months ago

Great! I'll vote third party then.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Why are you bothering to vote at all in that case?

[-] StinkyOnions@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Young and stupid is what I'm assuming.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Dean Phillips ? What ?

[-] TwattyMctwatterson@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

Biden has done so much good and helped get this country back into a sane space in an insane time full of outright lies and misinformation. It is admirable but he is losing this race in the media and his policy of feeding the machine in the Middle East is eroding his base and alienating his minority voters. You can ignore it and you can make excuses but it is not going away. I can understand people wanting him to step aside and the party nominate someone else. The problem is the party has no one else that can garner the support needed to beat Trump. The right does not care, they don't have a problem with a rapist con artist leading their party. Trump has said everything he is going to do and the party is numb to outright illegal behavior. Maybe this awakens the left voters who historically don't vote...I hope it works, I will vote for Biden because I can't in good conscience vote for the right and their current agenda.

Anyway, that's my take...but what do I know, I'm just some peckerwood from south Texas.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

The problem isn't if voters are voting for Biden or Trump, it's if the voters will get off the couch to even vote.

[-] TwattyMctwatterson@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago

I can agree with that for sure.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


At a New Hampshire campaign event for Democratic presidential candidate Rep. Dean Phillips (Minn.) on Thursday, former presidential candidate Andrew Yang claimed that if President Biden becomes the party’s nominee, he will “deliver to us Trump the sequel.”

Like, Joe Biden, who I supported last time, in my view, is going to deliver us to Trump the sequel.”

I am going to do something about it.’ And Dean Phillips is the only one with the courage, the character and conviction to go against the grain, to go against the legion of followers in Washington, D.C., who would put their careers above their country and said, ‘You know what?

The Minnesota Democrat has repeatedly stated that the 2024 election is about the future, and the country deserves better than a 2020 rematch between Biden and former President Trump, the likely Republican nominee.

In a recent interview, Phillips said there is not “one shred of evidence” that Biden can overtake Trump in the upcoming election.

At Thursday’s Manchester, N.H., campaign event, Yang highlighted the 54-year-old three-term lawmaker, and said having someone younger in office address challenges such as artificial intelligence would “help me sleep more soundly at night.” He continued, suggesting the Biden administration may be complacent in solving the country’s problems because they “think they’re going to be” in office either way.


The original article contains 393 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 44%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

The Dems are fragmenting and it’s Biden’s fault. He’s too old and frail to be president. Ideally he would’ve taken the route LBJ took and announced his decision to abstain from running a re-election campaign, then endorsed the chosen nominee.

[-] TwattyMctwatterson@lemmings.world 1 points 8 months ago

But (fingers in the ears) lalalalalalalalalala

this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
-24 points (26.0% liked)

politics

18933 readers
2769 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS