94
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

This is a great self-explanatory lesson in how corporations can manufacture consent and how to spot it.

[-] cooljacob204@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

I don't even bother going in person anymore to most stores due to everything being locked up and one employee who can never be found to open shit.

It also just rubs me wrong. Why would I want to do business with your store if it treats me like in thief. Especially those "you are bring recorded!!!" monitors.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I wonder how much is due to self checkout.

[-] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 31 points 8 months ago

Or having a single employee manage an entire store. This is entirely the fault of these stores and their lack of investment in their own employees.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I honestly hope this don't make them disappear, for one good thing they did. Yeah I understand people wanting another option as well but I love the self checkout thing, specially when buying low quantities.

[-] XTornado@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 months ago

Next you will tell me that some of the price increases are not caused by inflation, yeah sure old man.... Stop saying stupid things /s

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Videos of people brazenly stealing merchandise from retailers often went viral; chains closed some of their stores and cited a rise in theft as the primary reason; and drugstores such as CVS and Walgreens started locking up more of their inventory, including everyday items like toothpaste, soaps, and snacks.

It said that nearly half of all inventory loss in 2021, which amounted to roughly $94 billion, was driven by “organized retail crime” — that is, coordinated shoplifting for the purpose of reselling goods on the black market.

But their critics have pounced on faulty statistics like the one put out by the National Retail Federation as evidence that America needs to expand policing and once again impose harsher penalties for petty crimes, reversing reforms that have sought to reduce incarceration rates, including looser enforcement of laws around things like drug possession, loitering, or, in some cases, shoplifting low-cost goods.

Regardless, part of the reason so many retailers and lawmakers have sounded the alarm on a rise in thefts might be because reports of shoplifting had plummeted when Covid first hit, and then shot back up after stores reopened.

It didn’t matter what the reality was; it seemed that the public’s perception of rising crime was enough for politicians from both major parties to feel the need to look tougher — be they Eric Adams, the Democratic mayor of New York City, or Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida and candidate for president.

As shoddy data about shoplifting helps stir up fear of a potential crime wave, voters are becoming less tolerant of those kinds of policies, and progressive prosecutors have faced tough election cycles in recent years as a result.


The original article contains 1,623 words, the summary contains 281 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
94 points (94.3% liked)

politics

18956 readers
3484 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS