174
submitted 6 months ago by Windows94@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BoisZoi@lemmy.ml 111 points 6 months ago

Opera back in 2000s.

Compressing webpages, built in mail, built in BitTorrent client, tab stacking, "fit to width" which would remove horizontal scrollbars, page tiling, mouse gestures, rocker gestures, I think it even had a calendar.

It's a shame the direction Opera took after Jon left, but thankfully he started Vivaldi which feels like the spiritual successor.

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Opera also invented the browser Speed Dial, which was super handy back in the day.

But most importantly, Opera invented tabs, or at least the concept of tabbed browsing. I recall using Opera on Windows 3.11 and for the longest time, even during the Win 9x era, no other app used tabs.

In addition to mouse gestures, they had customisable keyboard shortcuts for practically every browser feature, again, something which very few apps bothered with.

The page compression built into Opera Mini was a life saver on Symbian and Windows Mobile devices back in the 2G/GPRS era. Opera Mini loaded pages blindingly quick and there was nothing else like it on the market, even leading up to early Android days.

but thankfully he started Vivaldi which feels like the spiritual successor.

Too bad he made the unfortunate decision of going with the Chromium engine instead of Gecko, or even making their own engine. I would've loved to use Vivalidi if it weren't for that fact.

[-] lud@lemm.ee 9 points 6 months ago

Opera didn't actually invent browser tabs. That's a common misconception.

Tabs was first invented for the browser InternetWorks

[-] dan@upvote.au 18 points 6 months ago

Opera also invented full page zooming. Originally, browser zoom would only increase text size - everything else (including images, the actual page layout, etc) would remain the same size. Opera was the first browser to instead zoom into the entire page.

It also had a lot of features that either require extensions or don't even exist these days. Things like being able to disable JavaScript or change the User-agent per-site, basic content blocking before ad blockers existed (like modern-day ad blockers but you'd manually build your own list of things to block by going into content blocking mode and clicking on them), an option to only show cached images (useful on slow dial up connections), a fully customizable UI (literally every toolbar, button, and status bar segment could be moved around), and many more.

It was truly a web browser for the future, far far ahead of its time. I miss those days.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Elorageuse@jlai.lu 87 points 6 months ago

VLC, when codec were thé worst.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 months ago

Absolutely VLC, VLC was excellent at what it does before codec issues were even that widespread.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 months ago

Words cannot convey how sketchy the MP4 codec scene was, pirating media in the Windows XP era. Every month you'd have to find some DivX CCCP K-Lite [cracked].7zip.exe and roll the fuckin' dice.

We were very proficient at reinstalling our operating systems.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 72 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

NextStep - eventually became Mac OS X (that’s why all sorts of system calls start with NS)

BeOS. Playing 4 video streams at the same time in 1995 was mind blowing.

OS/2 was WINE before WINE

SixDegrees was a social network before Friendster

Prodigy was an online service (and ISP later) owned by Sears, which had a significant mail-order business. It could have been Amazon.

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 25 points 6 months ago

I used to work at Sears, and I could never figure out how a company that found its initial success in a catalog business didn’t immediately see the opportunities the internet presented. Now Sears is all but gone, and Bezos gets to go to space with Shatner :(

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 16 points 6 months ago

Man, I remember seeing that BeOS demonstration that had a spinning cube with a different video playing on each face, and being absolutely dumbfounded. Thanks for reminding me of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 62 points 6 months ago

Flash and Java, honestly, albeit in different ways. Both saw the web as a platform above all platforms.

Flash was the only way for browsers to do anything high-performance or good-looking from like 1997 to 2010. Any idiot could slap together a cool spinning animation with gradient-colored vector graphics. There were countless genuinely-free games, apparently made for the fun of making them, and even more interactive animations, apparently made to be as offensive as humanly possible.

Java was the big-grey-rectangle alternative, where you knew your browser was about to spend five entire minutes loading something, just to demonstrate a bouncing ball experiment or whatever. But: it was a real general-purpose executable format, with no installation or setup. You stuck a program on a page and it worked right there on the page. Eventually. And once it loaded it'd hitch and jerk constantly, because garbage-collection was always a terrible idea. But sometimes you'd find a page that'd hitch and jerk through playing Quake 2 in your goddamn web browser.

What ultimately killed them was that Adobe is among the worst software companies in the world and Oracle is number one. Flash was a security nightmare. It was hacked together for impressive functionality, and then repackaged for ease of use, so it was about as exploit-hardened as a wet paper towel. The fact it ran poorly on phones (and Steve Jobs was a dick) was just the excuse to stop tolerating its endless vulnerabilities. Java meanwhile was an okay format owned by the devil. It served kinda the same role as WebAssembly does now, except absolutely no-one wanted to put up with licensing it, because Oracle likes to sue its competitors and fuckin' loves to sue its customers. The company name is an acronym for One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison. And if two devices running Java connect via wifi, he expects the air in-between them to be properly licensed. If the free software movement had not been founded to say "fuck printers," it would have sprung into being in order to say "fuck Oracle."

Anyway.

Google Chrome, intolerable leash that it now is, made Javascript usefully fast in 2008. Prior to that it was interpreted. Javascript calculators in the AOL days could lag. Mozilla responded with asm.js, inviting the language itself to be performant. Nowadays just about anything could be WASM + WebGPU, and quite frankly most things should be. But for some stupid reason even the chat programs written in Javascript bundle their own browser.

[-] dan@upvote.au 16 points 6 months ago

IMO there's still nothing that's quite as good as Flash. Efficient vector animations that perform consistently across all major browsers are still unusually hard for non-developers. There are some solutions, but they usually aren't as designer or animator-friendly and require a huge JavaScript library to be loaded. The barrier to entry for non-developers (or inexperienced developers) creating games that run well cross-browser is still quite high too.

I remember creating a Flash-based chat system back in the day. Before WebSockets and Server Sent Events, Flash was the only way to get bidirectional sockets in a web browser, other than Java applets of course (which were pretty locked down by that point).

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Ruffle is obviously as good as Flash, by emulating Flash - but yeah, the creative environment is missing. We need some .io page that clones the old way of churning out 2D games and animations.

We're in a stupid period of computing where a legitimate way to get games on smartphones and computers is to publish software for DOS because everything has some kind of emulator for that archaic platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 58 points 6 months ago
[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 40 points 6 months ago

The fact he called the language HolyC is brilliant. He might be crazy, but that doesn't mean he isn't a genius.

[-] Chobbes@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately your statements should be past tense :(. They died kind of tragically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Wow, that was a wild ride of a story. Very sad though.

[-] dan@upvote.au 49 points 6 months ago

Do websites count? Vine fizzled out but it would have been a huge success with today's TikTok crowd.

[-] hughesdikus@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 months ago

It had today's tiktok crowd. It was a huge hit. The only reason it failed is because of monetisation.

Only reason YouTube is popular. No competitor can match it in those terms.

Saying Vine was ahead of its time is like saying Digg or MySpace was ahead of its time. No it was at the precipice and just horribly failed to manage its growth and responding to competitors

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BOFH@lemmy.ml 45 points 6 months ago

UNIX systems in the 1960s. They are still in use to this day and modified ones run our phones, Steam Decks and space craft!

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 27 points 6 months ago

This is a matter of interpretation, I'll wager, but to me, "before its time" implies something that came about too early, before the world was ready for it. I'd argue that Unix was of its time, since it was the operating system that went on to widespread success. That is to say, I think that it's Multics that was before its time. It was derided at the time for being too large and complex (2MB of memory—outrageous!!), and the creators of Unix were Multics programmers who borrowed many of its concepts to make a smaller, less resource-intensive OS that ran better on the computers of the day.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] krasny@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

Imho NAPSTER. Crazy days of sharing mp3's files.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vvvvv@lemmy.world 42 points 6 months ago

Excel enabled non-programmers to create basically any app as long as they are fine with a cell-based UI. Same with Access and CRUD apps. I know people love to dunk on M$ here, and for good reasons too, but these two programs are probably responsible for a decent chunk or PoC/v1 projects worldwide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jknaraa@lemmy.ml 30 points 6 months ago

All of it, because apparently humans were wholly unprepared for using computer technology responsibly.

[-] Repelle@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Real Player.

Nobody had enough bandwidth to actually stream anything. I guess some people had IDSN, and maybe even fewer cable internet, but the majority of the world was still on dial up. You can't stream video on dial up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago
[-] kenbw2@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

I think its downfall was being a closed beta, which made it useless for communicating with other people who weren't already invited

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 28 points 6 months ago

Alter Ego, a 1986 life-simulator in which you start as a baby and play through an entire life, choose-your-own-adventure style.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Postgres, Postgres has always been extremely ahead of the curve... Even when it was Ingres.

[-] wabafee@lemm.ee 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Google glasses, I think it's death was mainly because it looks nerdy aside of course the huge privacy concerns. Which honestly don't exist now. Look at twitch streamers streaming everywhere. People installing cameras at their home and connected to the net for the world to see. Now we are going hard with VR/AR even Apple has a product for it.

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

The concerns exist and are bigger than ever. Ask c/privacy about it. You're referencing the fractional percentage of people who elect to be streamers. Irrelevant to the general population.

A decade ago, one of my local dives, never seen a fight break out there.. dude attacked a woman over them. You don't think people are more poor and angry and traumatized now?

https://www.eater.com/2014/2/25/6273629/woman-attacked-for-wearing-google-glass-at-a-bar-in-sf

I'd never hit a woman or condone violence like this. And, fuck invasive undercover surveillance cameras. This technology can stay in a fuckin dumpster.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago

Fwiw, citing c/privacy on Lemmy is very, very much also referencing a fractional percentage of society.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Mango@lemmy.world 20 points 6 months ago

DLNA protocol.

Seriously, how has it been passed up by all the worst little steaming gimmicks?

[-] Chobbes@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Okay, I’m probably super ignorant and in need of a lesson… Every piece of DLNA software I’ve ever messed with sucked and was a massive security and privacy issue? I haven’t looked at it much, but it didn’t seem worth it? Is it good? What’s good about it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Trent@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago

GEOS on the C64 (and possibly others)? A desktop environment before machines really had the power to pull it off decently.

[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

Quake 3, modern first person shooters are still based on that game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] amzd@kbin.social 16 points 6 months ago

Battlefield heroes. Somehow it couldn’t pay the bills while that style of game is insanely popular now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] kattenluik@feddit.nl 15 points 6 months ago

The Source game engine was completely unmatched in its time.

[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago
[-] popproxx@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

Kai's Power Tools in 1992 . The interface was so next level it felt out of place and the more you used it features would get unlocked and more advanced. https://winworldpc.com/product/kais-power-tools/20

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

for those chatbot lovers, respect to the one from 1966 : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA

[-] Sqasl@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

Dr Sbaitso early TTS and kinda-AI psychologist, with his cantankerous, all-caps responses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UsefulInfoPlz@kbin.social 9 points 6 months ago

Hardware and software combo… video toaster from Newtech
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_Toaster

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
174 points (97.8% liked)

Asklemmy

42523 readers
853 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS