[-] papertowels@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

I studied a lot of machine learning, going into the math and whatnot behind it.

In reality these days, you just start some model with a single line of code and you're set.

You have to know best practices and whatnot, sure, but I fully agree - science and engineering are two different disciplines and should be taught as such.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago

Shout-out to framework laptops for repairable, upgradeable, and reusable components.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Where's rusty shackleford work?

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Doesn't sound very instant to me

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago

Wait hold on, so someone buys tickets to an event, show up, and have to buy canned water.

What, in your imagination, should be the next steps so they "don't consent to being abused"?

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Non human origin matters because it's easy to flood the field with this stuff.

If finding quality videos becomes a needle in a haystack amidst ai generated bullshit, each looking to passively earn a few bucks, overall quality of life will suffer as the ouroboros eats its tail.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm just sitting here really confused at the choice to defederate based on a single chat.

Most folks at programming.dev, myself included, are there because it's related to their profession. That's what drew us there.

It baffles me to think that the entire instance has been judged and deemed unworthy because of a single comment chain that had disagreements.

You can block users you don't want to interact with. Some instances breed a potentially nasty sentiment or attitude, and when there are too many users from that instance to block, that's when I'd consider defederation. But a single conversation thread, involving a single person?

I've got no say in how another instance is ran. Just makes me a little sad about a much more fragmented future of Lemmy.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago

Yo did she just do that to someone lying on the ground? My ribcage hurts....

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago

MUST BE THE LIBRUL AGENDA

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago

Fwiw, citing c/privacy on Lemmy is very, very much also referencing a fractional percentage of society.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago

Don't forget that trump wished for his political enemies to "rot in hell" as part of his Merry Christmas message, , and he also shared a word cloud that prominently featured "revenge" and "dictatorship" with no context.

People who say "I'm not Trump" is not good enough of a reason to vote for a candidate are being petulant children. Trump has said he'd pardon all January 6th convicts if elected day 1. This will embolden political violence like none other, because if "your guy" gets in, you will face no consequences, so the amount of lying, cheating, and stealing when it comes to elections will go through the goddamn roof.

This man is on a hateful warpath. He will abuse the hell out of the office because of his ego. And people like the state secretary mentioned here will be in power while cheering him on.

[-] papertowels@programming.dev 62 points 9 months ago

Padme_meme.jpg

view more: next ›

papertowels

joined 9 months ago