This seems to have worked with my boomer mom: "be that as it may, wouldn't we all be better off by reducing pollution?"
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
I tell people that burning a 100 million barrels of oil a day, everyday, has to have an impact.
Imagine how much exhaust that is everyday.
The idea that burning a million barrels of oil everyday would not have an impact on the atmosphere is absurd.
I think CO2 is good for life, but cement in cities, deforestation and the heat produce by burninf fuel must be bad.
I don't trust too much the CO2 crisis, we got other pollution like micropastics and eternal chemicals I believe are more serious.
Anyways I still commute by public transport even though I have a company car with petrol, everyone can help.
Well without a real sense of the size of the atmosphere (which most people don't have), that doesn't really mean anything, other than it being a big number. Any impressively big number can be insignificant in relation to something big enough to easily absorb it.
However, we've added to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by 50%. I think that says it really is significant.
Maybe show them this:

Nothing. You canβt logic someone out of a position they didnβt use logic to get to in the first place. Thereβs way more unmotivated and un-mobilized people out there that believe in human caused climate change that are more worth your time and energy.
If your house is too warm and you're running 20 electric heaters but for some reason think it's something else causing the heat, it'd still pay to turn off some of those heaters to compensate for the external cause since you actually have control over the heaters.
If you really think that anything you say will have any impact on them then maybe it doesn't matter what the cause is as long as you can get them onboard with the solution. The two are inextricably linked so if they're really adamant about this you'll probably not be successful in this endeavour but it's worth a try if you have some faith in them. If they think it's all long term cyclical solar patterns or some other non anthropogenic cause it might be worth pointing out that it's still happening and causing consequences. The trouble will be not implying too heavily as I have in my heaters example, that the solution is obviously linked to the cause, even if it is. Otherwise they will not believe you have common ground.
I told my dad that even if climate change isn't real, or if it is humans don't contribute... what's the harm in doing something about it? What's the harm in doing something to help your grandkids have a world to grow up in and enjoy?
He installed solar panels a few years ago and now likes to talk about how he heats and cools his home without paying ConEd
Save your breath. It's honestly not worth it.
Exactly, just say "you are too stupid to understand the explanation" and walk away.
Tell them you're proud of them, they seem to be a high functioning mentally disabled person and are doing great in life.
So... where's the extra heat coming from? If you acknowledge it exists where's it from?
Is it a problem? If it is shouldn't we prevent or prepare for it?
Highlight the speed of change now, since industrial revolution, compared to historical data.
Nothing, there's no use in making him feel bad for something he has no control over.
Don't be ridiculous, maybe not in the same measure of all of Exxon etc. , but individuals can and do contribute to pollution and climate change.
I'm not going to feel one bit guilty about contributing a tiny fraction.
It's like wanting an individual to pick up a can lid while companies dump truckloads of garbage.
And they, or the governments they own have zero intention of changing, on the contrary.
who's ridiculous here?
I would generally expect of people not to litter, yes
that is totally not the point
How conveniently lazy of you.
another one that doesn't get it
We have people like this running Egypt. They're constantly cutting down trees!
Trees in Egypt?
Yes for sure, it's not a desert
Just be like, "Okay, what about the pacific garbage patch? Did human activity cause that? Should we be trying to fix it?" It's pretty hard to argue that the fish made all the used water bottles themselves.
Ask them what prompted them to be a geologist.
What if that person think CO2 is good for life?
Do research. Give them that. Walk away and never think or talk about it with them again.
You can't fix stupid.
Nothing. You benefit more from having someone who will help you plan and prepare for the effects of climate change than you do from having someone who agrees with you about the causes.
The reason for that is you and your comrade canβt do anything impactful about the human sources of climate change.
Nothing. Just walk away. I don't understand why people would willingly engage in completely pointless arguments at all... it's a huge part of why I left Facebook and Reddit and come here now instead. People on there literally just to argue and pick fights with other people.
I don't care if it's my dad, my neighbour, or an old friend from school ... if they believe that, they believe that, and nothing I can say is going to change their mind - and it's not my place to change their mind.
If my son said that to me, yes, it is my place to make sure he is properly educated, so we'd go through some Wikipedia articles and/or watch a couple documentaries about it, so people who understand all of it a hell of a lot better than I do can explain it to him properly. I am not a climate scientist.
I tell them their brain is fried and I move on. Nothing will convince these people.
Slap them in the face. If they complain, tell them the pain is real but human activity didnβt contribute to it.
I came to post pretty much the exact same thing π€£
Just show them that one xkcd about how abrupt the current warming is and how nicely it lines up with industrialization. The comparison between the natural slow shifts in global climate vs. what's been happening the last century or so is the clearest counter to "but the climate has always been changing".
The other times that things have changed in comparable timescales, it's been caused by supervolcanoes or other such calamities.
Edit: Oh yeah one caveat: The xkcd is ten years old and we're now actually already around +1.5Β°C.
I showed that to my father. Completely ignored it.
I guess it didn't align with his beliefs.