1307
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 191 points 10 months ago

Sanders notably attributed the war in Gaza to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and “the right-wing Netanyahu government” — not to Israel in general.

This extremely obvious distinction seems to get completely lost in every discussion on the topic. I like Israel and they have the right to exist. I don't like far right conservative governments run by corrupt war criminals (but enough about Bush...).

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 102 points 10 months ago

Absolutely. Just like caring about the fate of innocent Palestinians doesn't mean rooting for the Hamas terrorists. Another distinction a lot of bad faith actors conveniently ignore in order to shift the narrative.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Absolutely.

There are essentially 4 groups that need to be discussed here. The governments of Palestine and Israel, and the civilians of Palestine and Israel.

The governments are both murderous monsters who feed off of each other to fuel their hatred and justify genocide.

The civilians are the Innocents being killed and displaced.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 43 points 10 months ago

In part because there are people actively and deliberately muddying together the Netanyahu government and Israel (as well as Israel and Jews) so that any criticism of the actions of Israel or Netanyahu can be labeled "antisemitism".

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

I mean Netanyahu has been winning elections since 1996 (granted there was a gap in the middle) so the election is getting dubious.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 148 points 10 months ago

Has this guy ever been wrong about anything?

Best President we never had.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Pity right? Right up there with what could've been had RBG stepped down a bit earlier.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 25 points 10 months ago

I'll never forgive her for clinging on to power. She destroyed her legacy and ruined lives for the greed of it

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

RBG wanted Hillary to pick her replacement. The hubris of that decision. SMH

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

I mean yeah he actually wasn’t quick to denounce Israel’s genocide in Gaza. I am super happy he has come around but I think I’m the beginning he was reluctant to (not because he agreed with it, because he probably didn’t want to mess with Israeli money coming after him politically).

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

I doubt he gives a good fuck about AIPAC setting their sights on him, they've been sniping for years.

I can't speak for him but my bet is that he's experienced enough to wait for the dust to settle a little before forming an opinion.

[-] dumpsterlid@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Fair, whatever the reason is I am glad he is on the right side now

[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 28 points 10 months ago

Dude was raised in a Jewish family and volunteered with his wife in Israel in college.

Mad props for ever speaking out about Israel, IMO.

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

I don't think he's alone. The Hamas attack was a shock to many people, and Israel of course would respond but... even six weeks ago it was starting to become obvious that this was a gross overreaction.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

He's against nuclear power, and that's the only thing I've ever disagreed with him on.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world 106 points 10 months ago

Awaiting the Christian Right to call him antisemitic.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

Conservative Democrats will do it first.

[-] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 9 points 10 months ago

When haven't they done that?

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

Not the first time this happened.

[-] Mammal@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

The Christian right aren't Sanders actual enemies; that would be the Democratic party.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago

Military industrial complex goes BRRRRRRR while the oligarchy distracts you with yet another "most important election of your life" — forcing you to choose between fascist dystopia or neoliberal dystopia instead of ... actually improving the planet and society for future generations.

[-] xor@sh.itjust.works 54 points 10 months ago

ok but, trump actually directly said he plans on being a dictator... it's really the most important election in much of american history...

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Just because Biden is the lesser evil (and he most certainly is. By far) doesn't mean that he should be allowed to be an evil.

He's supposed to represent the interests of every American who isn't a fascist, not a foreign government that IS fascist.

[-] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Agreed. What does that change? I’m still voting for Biden.

There aren’t any perfect choices in life, all choices of consequence have downsides. Sometimes it’s choosing harm reduction. The man has a solid record of progress with climate legislation, pardoning marijuana possession charges, limiting insulin prices and more.

Could he do better? Hell yeah. But I’m an adult in a democracy and I understand that a vote is a tool, not a moral stance. I can apply that tool in the most effective way by voting for a lesser evil.

I also have other tools at my disposal, like money. So I give my money to groups like FairVote that supports Ranked Choice Voting so that, long after the 2024 election, we can vote for candidates instead of against them.

But I’m not boycotting the system we have unless someone can convince me that Trump will see a lack of voter turnout as a lack of mandate to implement his anti-Democratic, thuggish, racist, sexist plans.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Fossil fuel industry too, since there's a shitload of natural gas off the coast of Gaza.

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 54 points 10 months ago

Yeah it's hard to disagree with this. While I don't think that the US or Canada can do much to influence the situation politically, neither should they be providing support militarily.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works 52 points 10 months ago

Bro the US used their veto in the UN to prevent the demand for a ceasefire passing. Literally only USA and Israel voted against. The US is the most powerful country in the world for now, you'd be hard pressed to find an arena of politics they DONT have immense power over. Certainly they have power over the genocides their allies do.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 33 points 10 months ago

Hmm, I feel like the US are why Israel can do as it pleases. If it weren't for the US backup the chances of a new war on Israel by several of it's neighbors backed by Iran would be very plausible. I don't wish for this to happen, it would be horrible, and I understand that the US should perhaps back Israel to a certain degree. But in return they can ask a lot from Israel, and if Israel doesn't even comply with not committing terrible war crimes, then the US could threaten them with not having their backs anymore.

What I'm trying to say is: I think you underestimate the role the US can play.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

providing military support is influencing the situation politically

[-] shredderdoitbetta@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Stop funding terrorists, stop funding evil regimes, it's not so hard

[-] fastandcurious@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fucking Anti-Semite!

Edit: /s

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Clear sarcasm getting blasted. C'mon lemmy.

[-] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I've never seen a post where the /s seemed less necessary. You're better than this Lemmy.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Wanna know the dirty little secret about lemmy that we've all slowly had to realize about reddit too? We're not better than this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

There really is no such thing as clear sarcasm in this political climate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

And to think the DNC wanted to attack him for being Jewish.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1307 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS